The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data
Abstract
The framework of a national land use and land cover classification system is presented for use with remote sensor data. The classification system has been developed to meet the needs of Federal and State agencies for an up-to-date overview of land use and land cover throughout the country on a basis that is uniform in categorization at the more generalized first and second levels and that will be receptive to data from satellite and aircraft remote sensors. The proposed system uses the features of existing widely used classification systems that are amenable to data derived from remote sensing sources. It is intentionally left open-ended so that Federal, regional, State, and local agencies can have flexibility in developing more detailed land use classifications at the third and fourth levels in order to meet their particular needs and at the same time remain compatible with each other and the national system. Revision of the land use classification system as presented in U.S. Geological Survey Circular 671 was undertaken in order to incorporate the results of extensive testing and review of the categorization and definitions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Periglacial Environment: Past and Present
(1969) · McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1w6tb9v · Cited by 1,093
Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States
Küchler, A. W. (1965) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-196505000-00019 · Cited by 839
Glacial and Pleistocene Geology
Wooldridge, S. W., & Flint, R. F. (1958) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/1790816 · Cited by 516
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-0276 · Cited by 281
The Natural Geography of Plants
Bell, P. R., Gleason, H. A., & Cronquist, A. (1965) · Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/1792765 · Cited by 98
猪熊, 泰., & 鈴木, 時. (1951) · 日本林學會誌 · Cited by 39
Cited by
Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment
Foody, G. M. (2002) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00295-4 · Cited by 4,580
Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands
Lehner, B., & Döll, P. (2004) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.028 · Cited by 2,367
Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States
Cowardin, L. M., Service, U. S. F. A. W., & (U.S.), B. S. P. (1979) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.4108 · Cited by 2,153
A Self-Modifying Cellular Automaton Model of Historical Urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area
Clarke, K. C., Hoppen, S., & Gaydos, L. (1997) · Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b240247 · Cited by 1,449
Dynamic world, near real-time global 10 m land use land cover mapping
Brown, C. F., Brumby, S. P., Guzder-Williams, B., Birch, T., Hyde, S. B., Mazzariello, J., Czerwinski, W., Pasquarella, V. J., Haertel, R., Ilyushchenko, S., et al. (2022) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01307-4 · Cited by 1,154
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., & Witmer, R. E.
- Venue
- Professional Paper
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 1976
- ISSN
- 1044-9612 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-7102
- OpenAlex
- W1536340909
- Cited by
- 4,827
- References
- 6
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.