Cited by 3Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsSoil erosion and sediment transportPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Highway-runoff quality, and treatment efficiencies of a hydrodynamic-settling device and a stormwater-filtration device in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Horwatich, Judy A., Bannerman, Roger T., Pearson, Robert·2011·Scientific Investigations Report

Abstract

The treatment efficiencies of two prefabricated stormwater-treatment devices were tested at a freeway site in a high-density urban part of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. One treatment device is categorized as a hydrodynamic-settling device (HSD), which removes pollutants by sedimentation and flotation. The other treatment device is categorized as a stormwater-filtration device (SFD), which removes pollutants by filtration and sedimentation. During runoff events, flow measurements were recorded and water-quality samples were collected at the inlet and outlet of each device. Efficiency-ratio and summation-of-load (SOL) calculations were used to estimate the treatment efficiency of each device. Event-mean concentrations and loads that were decreased by passing through the HSD include total suspended solids (TSS), suspended sediment (SS), total phosphorus (TP), total copper (TCu), and total zinc (TZn). The efficiency ratios for these constituents were 42, 57, 17, 33, and 23 percent, respectively. The SOL removal rates for these constituents were 25, 49, 10, 27, and 16 percent, respectively. Event-mean concentrations and loads that increased by passing through the HSD include chloride (Cl), total dissolved solids (TDS), and dissolved zinc (DZn). The efficiency ratios for these constituents were -347, -177, and 20 percent, respectively. Four constituents—dissolved phosphorus (DP), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), and dissolved copper (DCu)—are not i…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3133/sir20105160

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mean total suspended solids concentrations from typical highway runoff range between 10 and 405 mg/L.

    “while mean TSS concentrations from typical highway runoff range between 10 and 405 mg = L (Barrett et al. 1998; Flint and Davis 2007; Horwatich et al. 2010; Water Planning Division 1982; Wissler et al. 2020a, b)”

    From Green Infrastructure in Series to Treat Stormwater Runoff from a Highway Overpass (2024) · cites this paper as Horwatich et al. 2010

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Horwatich, J. A., Bannerman, R. T., & Pearson, R.
Venue
Scientific Investigations Report
Published
2011
Pages
i-76
ISSN
  • 2328-031X (ISSN-L)
  • 2328-0328
OpenAlex
W1594144357
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2014: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Scientific investigations report (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
stormwater runoff, treatment efficiency, road runoff, urban stormwater pollution, total suspended solids, total phosphorus, copper, zinc, chloride, total dissolved solids, chemical oxygen demand, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, filtration, Milwaukee, event mean concentration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review