Cited by 36Forest Management and PolicyPolitical Influence and Corporate StrategiesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Chapter 2. The Business and Government Nexus: Principal Elements and Dynamics of the Canadian Forest Policy Regime

Howlett, Michael, Rayner, Jeremy·2001·Canadian Forest Policy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3138/9781442672192-004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J.
Venue
Canadian Forest Policy
Published
2001-12-31
Pages
23-62
OpenAlex
W2528191383
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Toronto Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
forest policy, state-business relations, forest industry, policy regimes, forest governance, Canadian forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review