Subverting and Negotiating Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the LSI in a Canadian Youth Custody Facility
Abstract
This case study examines probation officers and local agents' strategies and approaches to completing and applying the Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI) to female young offenders at Youth House, an open-custody facility in central Canada. Both the probation officers and Youth House staff express concerns about the LSI and employ strategies to subvert its almost deterministic impact through discretionary practices. I show that the LSI's risk calculations are subverted by both Youth House staff and, to a lesser extent, the probation officers, thereby reducing the LSI's importance in the management of offenders. Lastly, I find that probation officers utilize the LSI to externalize responsibility. This tool provides them with a means by which to justify and rationalize their management decisions. This study supports not only the growing body of literature that examines risk in practice but also contributes to increasing knowledge on how risk rationales on the macro-level translate to practices at the local level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The risk-assessment approach has mostly been shrouded by the cultural and operational secrecy of Canada's powerful justice system, especially the correctional part.
“The risk-assessment approach, additionally, has mostly been shrouded by the cultural and operational secrecy of Canada's powerful justice system (especially the correctional part of it) (Ballucci, 2012; Taylor, 2023).”
From Colonization, Normalization and Risk-Assessment: The Case of Youth Criminal Justice Act and Correctional Overrepresentation of Indigenous Youth in Canada (2025) · cites this paper as Ballucci, 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 43 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Ballucci, D.
- Affiliations
- University of New Brunswick (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Ballucci, Dale
- ORCID
- Ballucci, Dale
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-228
- ISSN
- 1707-7753 (ISSN-L)
- 1911-0219
- OpenAlex
- W2037832308
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Keywords
- risk assessment, youth custody, probation officers, offender management, youth houses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review