Error Correction in the L2 Classroom
Abstract
La correction des erreurs est une activite importante de l'enseignant en langue. Il s'agit souvent de corriger les memes erreurs qui reviennent sans cesse, amenant l'enseignant a se demander si ses efforts ont un impact reel sur les progres de l'etudiant dans l'apprentissage de la langue. L'A. propose une methode de correction selective des erreurs : il s'agit de ne corriger les erreurs que d'une certain type de structure linguistique pendant une periode de temps donnee. Une enquete analyse l'efficacite de cette methode
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Error correction is often regarded as the most exhausting and time-consuming aspect of teachers' work.
“Error correction is often regarded as the most exhausting and time-consuming aspect of teachers' work (Ferris, 2002; Mantello, 1997).”
From Error Correction in the L2 Writing Classroom: What Do Students Think? (2005) · cites this paper as Mantello, 1997
Cites
Zamel, V. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586773 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Error Correction in the L2 Writing Classroom: What Do Students Think?
Lee, I. (2005) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v22i2.84 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Error Correction: Students’ Versus Teachers’ Perceptions
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2005) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658410508668828 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Zhang, T., Chen, X., Hu, J., & Ketwan, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660564 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“However, the highly focused WCF is criticized for its lack of ecological validity and pedagogical significance for real classrooms (Storch, 2010), given that learners generally expect an overall accuracy improvement by having all errors corrected (e.g., Lee, 2005; Amrhein and Nassaji, 2010).”
BackgroundResult
- Authors
- Mantello, M.
- Corresponding author
- Mantello, Maria
- Venue
- The Canadian Modern Language Review
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-131
- ISSN
- 0008-4506 (ISSN-L)
- 1710-1131
- OpenAlex
- W2073415733
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › French Language Learning Methods
- Keywords
- error correction, second language acquisition, teacher practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
