Cited by 4Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSocial impacts of COVID-19Family Dynamics and Relationships

Determinants of Family Stress and Domestic Violence: Lessons from the COVID-19 Outbreak

Open access
Béland, Louis-Philippe, Brodeur, Abel, Haddad, Joanne, Mikola, Derek·2021·Canadian Public Policy

Abstract

In this article, we examine Canadians’ concerns regarding the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on domestic violence and family stress. Our empirical analysis relies on a unique survey conducted online, the Canadian Perspective Survey Series, which allows us to investigate the determinants of concerns regarding family stress and domestic violence during the first COVID-19 lockdown. We find no evidence that changes in work arrangements are related to concerns regarding family stress and violence in the home. In contrast, we find that the inability to meet financial obligations and concerns about maintaining social ties are significantly related to concerns about family stress and domestic violence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3138/cpp.2020-119

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Actions such as social distancing, sheltering in place, restricted travel, and closures of key community resources are likely to dramatically increase the risk of family violence.

    “Actions such as social distancing, sheltering in place, restricted travel, and closures of key community resources are likely to dramatically increase the risk of family violence [32].”

    From Depression, anxiety, and stress in Korean general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2022) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Introduction (page not provided) links lockdowns and social isolation to possible increases in domestic violence, and reports an association between concerns about maintaining social ties and concerns about domestic violence. The paper does not establish that restricted travel or closures of community resources dramatically increase the risk of actual family violence; its own analysis measures concerns rather than violence incidence. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 4

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gelles, R.J., and M. Straus. 1979. “ Determinants of Violence in the Family: Toward a Theoretical Integration.” In Contemporary Theories about the Family, ed. W.R. Burr, R. Hill, F.I. Nye, and I.L. Reiss, 550– 81. New York: Free Press.
  2. Tubadji, A., F. Boy, and D.J. Webber. 2020. “ Narrative Economics, Public Policy and Mental Health.” Covid Economics: Vetted and Real-Time Papers 20: 120– 42. At https://cepr.org/sites/default/files/CovidEconomics20.pdf. PMC9617050 36340746

Authors
Béland, L.-P., Brodeur, A., Haddad, J., & Mikola, D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Economics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Carleton University (CA)
Venue
Canadian Public Policy
Published
2021-09-01
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
439-459
ISSN
  • 0317-0861 (ISSN-L)
  • 1911-9917
OpenAlex
W3147265576
Cited by
4
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Public Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • Carleton Economic Papers (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Social impacts of COVID-19
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, domestic violence, family stress, lockdown, work arrangements, financial liabilities, social ties, public concern

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review