Determinants of Family Stress and Domestic Violence: Lessons from the COVID-19 Outbreak
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we examine Canadians’ concerns regarding the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on domestic violence and family stress. Our empirical analysis relies on a unique survey conducted online, the Canadian Perspective Survey Series, which allows us to investigate the determinants of concerns regarding family stress and domestic violence during the first COVID-19 lockdown. We find no evidence that changes in work arrangements are related to concerns regarding family stress and violence in the home. In contrast, we find that the inability to meet financial obligations and concerns about maintaining social ties are significantly related to concerns about family stress and domestic violence.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Actions such as social distancing, sheltering in place, restricted travel, and closures of key community resources are likely to dramatically increase the risk of family violence.
“Actions such as social distancing, sheltering in place, restricted travel, and closures of key community resources are likely to dramatically increase the risk of family violence [32].”
From Depression, anxiety, and stress in Korean general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2022) · cites this paper as [32]
The Introduction (page not provided) links lockdowns and social isolation to possible increases in domestic violence, and reports an association between concerns about maintaining social ties and concerns about domestic violence. The paper does not establish that restricted travel or closures of community resources dramatically increase the risk of actual family violence; its own analysis measures concerns rather than violence incidence. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 4
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Gelles, R.J., and M. Straus. 1979. “ Determinants of Violence in the Family: Toward a Theoretical Integration.” In Contemporary Theories about the Family, ed. W.R. Burr, R. Hill, F.I. Nye, and I.L. Reiss, 550– 81. New York: Free Press.
- Tubadji, A., F. Boy, and D.J. Webber. 2020. “ Narrative Economics, Public Policy and Mental Health.” Covid Economics: Vetted and Real-Time Papers 20: 120– 42. At https://cepr.org/sites/default/files/CovidEconomics20.pdf. PMC9617050 36340746
- Authors
- Béland, L.-P., Brodeur, A., Haddad, J., & Mikola, D.
- Affiliations
- Department of Economics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Carleton University (CA)
- Venue
- Canadian Public Policy
- Published
- 2021-09-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 439-459
- ISSN
- 0317-0861 (ISSN-L)
- 1911-9917
- PMC
- PMC9395152
- OpenAlex
- W3147265576
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Canadian Public Policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Carleton Economic Papers (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Social impacts of COVID-19
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, domestic violence, family stress, lockdown, work arrangements, financial liabilities, social ties, public concern
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review