The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding the Right Mix: How Do Contextual Factors Affect Collaborative Mental Health Care in Ontario?
Abstract
The purpose of this research was (i) to describe the factors that affect collaboration among mental health service providers of different disciplines, (ii) to understand the mix of providers in existing collaborative care models, and (iii) to develop a framework to better understand the barriers and facilitators to interdisciplinary collaborative mental health delivery using Ontario as a case example. We draw upon the academic and policy literature and in-depth interviews with key informants from the disciplines of family medicine, psychiatry, psychology, social work, and nursing to identify factors that are important to the successful development of interdisciplinary collaborative mental health care.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The existing academic and policy literature suggests a broad range of factors both internal and external to the health care team that influence how well IPCTs collaborate [4, 22–27].”
From ‘Gearing Up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: a systematic review and conceptual framework (2016) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“Using many of the factors identified in the input–output-processes approaches, Mulvale and colleagues organized contextual factors as an interrelated set of policy (macro), organizational (meso), team (micro) and individual factors.”
From ‘Gearing Up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: a systematic review and conceptual framework (2016) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“When the findings are viewed within the proposed ‘gears’ conceptual model, empirical support is found for some factors within each of the macro, meso, micro and individual gears [25, 26, 38].”
From ‘Gearing Up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: a systematic review and conceptual framework (2016) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers
Hall, P. (2005) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820500081745 · Cited by 1,497
Interdisciplinary education and teamwork: a long and winding road
Hall, P., & Weaver, L. A. (2001) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00919.x · Cited by 797
Bourgeault, I. L., & Mulvale, G. M. (2006) · Health Sociology Review · doi:10.5172/hesr.2006.15.5.481 · Cited by 108
Self-citationMental Health Practices of Ontario Family Physicians: A Study Using Qualitative Methodology
Craven, M., Cohen, M. M., Campbell, D., Williams, J., & Kates, N. (1997) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674379704200905 · Cited by 58
Shared mental health care. Model for supporting and mentoring family physicians.
Rockman, P., Salach, L., Gotlib, D. A., Cord, M., & Turner, T. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 50
Shared mental health care: a bibliography and overview.
Craven, M. A., & Bland, R. C. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 39
Developing and implementing interprofessional learning in a Faculty of Health Professions.
Banks, S., & Janke, K. K. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 33
Using Financial Incentives to Promote Shared Mental Health Care
Dewa, C. S., Hoch, J. S., & Goering, P. N. (2001) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674370104600602 · Cited by 21
Mental health and primary care.
Arboleda‐Flórez, J., & Saraceno, B. (2001) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 13
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mulvale, G., Embrett, M., & Razavi, S. D. (2016) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0492-1 · Cited by 253
“This perspective helps recognize where opportunities exist for decision-makers at each level to encourage more effective collaboration in IPCTs [25].”
BackgroundSelf-citationInterprofessional interaction, negotiation and non-negotiation on general internal medicine wards
Reeves, S., Rice, K., Conn, L. G., Miller, K., Kenaszchuk, C., & Zwarenstein, M. (2009) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.3109/13561820902886295 · Cited by 167
Zwarenstein, M., Rice, K., Gotlib-Conn, L., Kenaszchuk, C., & Reeves, S. (2013) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-494 · Cited by 146
Lingard, L. A., Vanstone, M. G., Durrant, M., Fleming‐Carroll, B., Lowe, M., Rashotte, J., Sinclair, L. B., & Tallett, S. E. (2012) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e318271fc82 · Cited by 145
Mulvale, A., Miatello, A., Hackett, C., & Mulvale, G. M. (2016) · Patient Experience Journal · doi:10.35680/2372-0247.1104 · Cited by 97
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mulvale, G., & Bourgeault, I. L.
- Affiliations
- Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics
- Venue
- Canadian Public Policy
- Published
- 2007-01-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- Supplement 1
- Pages
- S49-S64
- ISSN
- 0317-0861 (ISSN-L)
- 1911-9917
- OpenAlex
- W1972802082
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Public Policy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Keywords
- interdisciplinary collaboration, mental health service providers, barriers and facilitators, general practice, social work, Ontario, integrated care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
