The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolution of Animal-Welfare Education for Veterinary Students
Abstract
Animal-welfare education is an evolving component of the veterinary curriculum. Although different veterinary schools may cover different elements of the subject and teach it in many different ways, it is important to recognize that this multidisciplinary subject is evolving rapidly. For example, welfare science is beginning to examine the quantification of positive welfare or a good life in addition to evaluating harms associated with different husbandry systems. Although the curriculum is under continual pressure, the drivers (policy makers, student expectations, and trade requirements) for including animal welfare in the course are likely to increase. Some core components of an animal-welfare course are important to include in all veterinary curriculums. This would include an appreciation of the difference between welfare science, ethics, and standards.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Changes do not only come from the outside, there also has to be pressure from within: students' expectations continue to be a driver in the evolution of animal‐welfare education [42].”
From A worldwide survey on the use of animal‐derived materials and reagents in scientific experimentation (2022) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Main DCJ, 2006, Vet Rec, 158, 62, 10.1136/vr.158.2.62 · DOI
- Main DCJ, 2005, J Vet Med Educ, 32, 505, 10.3138/jvme.32.4.505 · DOI
- Thornton P, 2001, Vet Rec, 148, 214
- Paul ES, 2000, Vet Rec, 146, 269, 10.1136/vr.146.10.269 · DOI
- Mullan S, 2001, In Practice, 23, 394, 10.1136/inpract.23.7.394 · DOI
- Morton DB, 1990, Hasting's Center R, 20, 13, 10.2307/3562760 · DOI
- 10.3138/jvme.37.1.3 · DOI
- Fraser D, 1997, Anim Welfare, 6, 187, 10.1017/S0962728600019795 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A worldwide survey on the use of animal‐derived materials and reagents in scientific experimentation
Cassotta, M., Bartnicka, J. J., Pistollato, F., Parvatam, S., Weber, T., D'Alessandro, V., Bastos, L. F., & Coecke, S. (2022) · Engineering in Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/elsc.202100167 · Cited by 33
Moody, C. M., Dewey, C. E., & Niel, L. (2020) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.256.9.1020 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Main, D. C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Veterinary Medical Education
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-35
- ISSN
- 0748-321X
- 1943-7218
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
