The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Canadian Social Studies
Abstract
Reviews of Canadian Social Studies published in 1936.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues
Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. M. (2004) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069032000072746 · Cited by 369
The invisible obstacle to educational equality: Gender bias in textbooks
Blumberg, R. L. (2008) · Prospects · doi:10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1 · Cited by 215
Hong, W.-P., & Youngs, P. (2016) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2014.959471 · Cited by 48
Gender (In)equality in English textbooks in the Philippines: A critical discourse analysis
Curaming, E. M., & Curaming, R. A. (2020) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-020-09750-4 · Cited by 48
Washington, S. A. (2025) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x251314884 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Brady
- Venue
- University of Toronto Quarterly
- Published
- 1937-04-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 377-386
- ISSN
- 0042-0247 (ISSN-L)
- 1712-5278
- OpenAlex
- W1183947676
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Canadian Social Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3138/utq.6.3.377
- The paper
- Brady. (1937). Canadian Social Studies. University of Toronto Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.3138/utq.6.3.377
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
