Applications of Geopolymer in Civil Engineering: Feasibility Study of Loess Stabilization and Waste Concrete Recycling
Open accessAbstract
The fast growing population and economic development have resulted in an increasing demand for residential and commercial buildings and infrastructures. However, there are problems identified to fulfill this demand, including that (1) problematic soils need to be treated/improved before the construction of building and infrastructures; (2) the Portland cement industry, which is used for concrete production and as the conventional soil stabilizer, is not environment friendly; (3) qualified natural aggregates for concrete production are being depleted; and (4) great amount of construction & demolition waste (C&D waste) is being produced every year. This means that green materials and recycling the C&D waste are of great significance to the civil engineers for the sustainable development. Geopolymer, which is an inorganic material formed by alkaline activation of aluminia- and silica-containing material through a polycondensation process, could be synthesized from various industrial by-products, such as fly ash and furnace slag, with high compressive strength, low shrinkage, and other engineering properties. This renders geopolymer a prospective future in civil engineering applications. This dissertation was therefore conducted to investigate the feasibility of applying the fly ash based geopolymer in the loess stabilization and waste concrete recycling. With the integration of composition and microstructure, a four-tier conceptual microstructure model is proposed to elucidate the origin of loess collapsibility. Based on the understanding of the origin of the collapsibility, the feasibility study of loess stabilization with geopolymer is then conducted. Results indicate that improved compressive strength, together with a compact and stable microstructure, has been rendered by the binding effect of geopolymer gel. Meanwhile, numerical analysis on recycled concrete shows that the new interfacial transition zone (NITZ) plays a detrimental role to the performance of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC), and could even contribute more to the mechanical failure of RAC at the microscale than the old interfacial transition zone (OITZ). With this observation, how to produce the RAC more effectively was then investigated in the feasibility study of waste concrete recycling with geopolymer.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 146 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- Liu, Z.
- Affiliations
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Zhen
- ORCID
- Liu, Zhen
- Publisher
- Louisiana State University Libraries
- Published
- 2015-05-11
- OpenAlex
- W2733219072
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 146
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Louisiana State University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Keywords
- geopolymer, loess stabilization, loess collapsibility, fly ash, concrete recycling, recycled aggregate concrete, interfacial transition zone, geopolymer microstructure, geopolymer gel, construction and demolition waste, sustainable construction materials, compressive strength
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review