The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Design and implementation of bus-holding control strategies with real-time information
Abstract
A systematic study is described to address various design and implementation issues associated with the problem of real-time bus holding control. Two holding control models have been investigated. The first model follows the conventional threshold-based control logic that determines holding times on the basis of headway to the preceding bus. The second model makes use of both preceding and following headways in identifying optimal control decisions with the assumption that real-time bus location information is available for estimating future bus arrivals at the control stop. An extensive simulation analysis is performed using a real-fife bus route operated by the Grand River Transit of the region of Waterloo, Ontario. The simulation results have substantiated several conclusions and yielded new findings on various issues such as where to set the control point, how many control points should be used, what is the optimal control strength, and what is the value of real-time location information.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Stop-skipping is a more obvious alternative: a delayed bus can recover quickly by skipping some downstream stops, which does not have an effect on the passengers on board”
From Real-time bus arrival prediction and bus bunching prevention using a multi-agent LSTM approach (2026) · cites this paper as Fu and Yang, 2002
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1287/trsc.6.1.52 · DOI
- Koffman D., 1978, Transportation Research Record 663, 41
- 10.1287/trsc.35.1.1.10143 · DOI
- Turnquist A. M., 1981, Transportation Research Record 818, 7
- Turnquist A. M., 1980, Transportation Research Record 746, 25
- Abkowitz M., 1984, Transportation Research Record 961, 1
- 10.1002/atr.5670200106 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1990)116:1(49) · DOI
- Lin G., 1995, Adaptive Control of Transit Operations. Final Report for Project MD-26-7002
- 10.1016/0191-2607(79)90007-4 · DOI
- Seneviratne P. N., Proc., International Conference on Microcomputers in Transportation, 1042
- 10.3141/1731-13 · DOI
- Li Y., 1993, Computer-Aided Transit Scheduling Proceedings
Cited by
Gavriilidou, A., & Cats, O. (2019) · Transportmetrica A: Transport Science · doi:10.1080/23249935.2018.1458757 · Cited by 48
Real-time bus arrival prediction and bus bunching prevention using a multi-agent LSTM approach
Rawat, S., Abaidullina, A., Alimbayeva, D., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Built Environment · doi:10.3389/fbuil.2026.1894212
Metadata
- Authors
- Fu, L., & Yang, X.
- Affiliations
- Department of Civil Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 1791
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-12
- ISSN
- 0361-1981
- 2169-4052
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.