Cited by 112Transportation Planning and OptimizationTransportation and Mobility InnovationsEconomic and Environmental Valuation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Attitudinal Market Segmentation Approach to Mode Choice and Ridership Forecasting: Structural Equation Modeling

Outwater, Maren L., Castleberry, Steve, Shiftan, Yoram, Ben-Akiva, Moshe, Shuang Zhou, Yu, Kuppam, Arun·2003·Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Abstract

The San Francisco Bay Area Water Transit Authority is evaluating expanded ferry service, as required by the California Legislature. As part of this process, Cambridge Systematics developed forecasts using a combination of market research strategies and the addition of nontraditional variables into the mode choice modeling process. The focus of this work was on expanding the mode choice model to recognize travelers' attitudes and different market segments. Structural equation modeling was used to simultaneously identify the attitudes of travel behaviors and the causal relationships between traveler's socioeconomic profile and traveler attitudes. Six attitudinal factors were extracted, and three of these were used to partition the ferry-riding market into eight segments. These market segments were used to estimate stated preference mode choice models for 14 alternative modes, which separated the travelers' reactions to time savings by market segment and which recognized that mode choices are different for market segments that are sensitive to travel stress or the desire to help the environment. The new mode choice models were applied within the framework of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's regional travel model and calibrated to match modal shares, modes of access to each ferry terminal, ridership by route and time period, and person trips by mode at screening line crossings. Additional validation tests of significant changes in ferry service in recent years were us…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3141/1854-04

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 112

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Badoe D. A., 1998, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 32, 190, 10.1002/atr.5670320205 · DOI
  2. Button K. J., 2001, Handbook of Transport Systems and Traffic Control, 3, 107, 10.1108/9781615832460-008 · DOI
  3. Brand D., 1994, Compendium of Technical Papers, 64th ITE Annual Meeting, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 338
  4. Roberts D. J. W., 1993, Proc., Seminar E, Planning and Transport Research and Computation European Transport, Highway, and Planning 21st Summer Annual Meeting, 173
  5. Mandel B. N., 1998, Interdependency of Airport Choice and Travel Demand
  6. Cascetta E., 1991, Proc., Seminar G, Planning and Transport Research and Computation European Transport, Highway, and Planning 19th Summer Annual Meeting, 17
  7. 10.1023/A:1014298902528 · DOI
  8. Koppelman F. S., 1978, Transportation Research Record 673, 157
  9. Proussaloglou K. E., 1989, Transportation Research Record 1221, 42
  10. Cambridge Systematics, 2001, Market Research Approach for Transit Works Long-Range Strategy
  11. Lieberman W., 2001, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1747, 60
  12. 10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00004-5 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00006-0 · DOI
  14. 10.1287/trsc.31.1.34 · DOI
  15. Gorsuch R. L., 1983, Factor Analysis
  16. Sapleton C. D., 1997, Working Paper
  17. 10.4135/9781412983778 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/014920639001600206 · DOI
  19. Hosmer D. W., 2001, Applied Logistic Regression
  20. Golob T. F., 2001, Structural Equation Modeling for Travel Behavior Research: Literature Review
  21. Arbuckle J. L., 1999, AMOS 4.0 User's Guide
  22. Myers J. H., 1996, Segmentation and Positioning for Strategic Marketing Decisions
  23. Chaston I., 1999, New Market Strategies
  24. Thompson M. E., 1998, Proc., Pacific Northwest SAS User's Group 98 Conference

Metadata

Authors
Outwater, M. L., Castleberry, S., Shiftan, Y., Ben-Akiva, M., Shuang Zhou, Y., & Kuppam, A.
Affiliations
  • Cambridge Systematics (United States) (US)
  • Systems Planning, San Francisco Bay Area Water Transit Authority, 120 Broadway Street, San Francisco, CA 94111
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Cambridge Systematics, 1300 Clay Street, Suite 1010, Oakland, CA 94612
Venue
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2003-01
Volume
1854
Issue
1
Pages
32-42
ISSN
  • 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-4052
OpenAlex
W2013256532
Cited by
112
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
market segmentation, traveler attitudes, stated preference, travel stress, environmental concern, time savings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review