The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Calibration and Validation of Microscopic Traffic Flow Models
Abstract
Microscopic simulation models are becoming increasingly important tools in modeling transport systems. A large number of models are used in many countries. The most difficult stage in the development and use of such models is the calibration and validation of the microscopic submodels such as the car-following and gap acceptance models. This difficulty results from the lack of suitable methods for adapting models to empirical data. Recent progress has been made in calibrating a number of microscopic traffic flow models. Ten very different models have been tested with data collected via Differential Global Positioning System-equipped cars on a test track in Japan. To calibrate the models, the data of the leading car are fed into the model under consideration, and the model is used to compute the headway time series of the following car. The deviations between the measured and the simulated headways are then used to calibrate and validate the models. The calibration results agree with earlier studies as there are errors of 12% to 17% for all models, and no model can be denoted to be the best. The differences between individual drivers are larger than the differences between different models. The validation process gives acceptable errors from 17% to 22%. But for special data sets with validation errors up to 60%, the calibration process has reached what is known as "overfitting": because of the adaptation to a particular situation, the models are not capable of generalizing to other situations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microscopic Traffic Simulation using SUMO
Lopez, P. A., Wiessner, E., Behrisch, M., Bieker-Walz, L., Erdmann, J., Flotterod, Y.-P., Hilbrich, R., Lucken, L., Rummel, J., & Wagner, P. (2018) · 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2018.8569938 · Cited by 3,297
Self-citationSPECIFICATION OF THE SOCIAL FORCE PEDESTRIAN MODEL BY EVOLUTIONARY ADJUSTMENT TO VIDEO TRACKING DATA
JOHANSSON, A., HELBING, D., & SHUKLA, P. K. (2007) · Advances in Complex Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219525907001355 · Cited by 508
Punzo, V., Borzacchiello, M. T., & Ciuffo, B. (2011) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.007 · Cited by 484
Connected vehicle-based road safety information system (CROSS): Framework and evaluation
Jo, Y., Jang, J., Park, S., & Oh, C. (2021) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.105972 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Brockfeld, E., Kühne, R. D., & Wagner, P.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 1876
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-70
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W2986120618
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calibration and Validation of Microscopic Traffic Flow Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3141/1876-07
- The paper
- Brockfeld, E., Kühne, R. D., & Wagner, P. (2004). Calibration and Validation of Microscopic Traffic Flow Models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.3141/1876-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.