The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hybrid Choice Modeling of New Technologies for Car Choice in Canada
Abstract
In the past decade, a new trend in discrete choice modeling has emerged: psychological factors are explicitly incorporated to enhance the behavioral representation of the choice process. In this context, hybrid models expand on standard choice models by including attitudes and perceptions as latent variables. The complete model is composed of a group of structural equations describing the latent variables in terms of observable exogenous variables and a group of measurement relationships linking latent variables to certain observable indicators. Although the estimation of hybrid models requires the evaluation of complex multidimensional integrals, simulated maximum likelihood is implemented to solve the integrated multiple-equation model. This study empirically evaluates the application of hybrid choice modeling to data from a survey conducted by the Energy and Materials Research Group (Simon Fraser University, 2002 and 2003) of the virtual personal vehicle choices made by Canadian consumers when they are faced with technological innovations. The survey also includes a complete list of indicators that allows the application of a hybrid choice model formulation. It is concluded that the hybrid choice model is genuinely capable of adapting to practical situations by including latent variables among the set of explanatory variables. The incorporation of perceptions and attitudes in this way leads to more realistic models and gives a better description of the profile of consumers and their adoption of new automobile technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Cited by
On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle
Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. L. (2013) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.006 · Cited by 560
An agent-based model to study market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
Eppstein, M. J., Grover, D. K., Marshall, J. S., & Rizzo, D. M. (2011) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.007 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolduc, D., Boucher, N., & Alvarez-Daziano, R.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 2082
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-71
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W2153943598
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hybrid Choice Modeling of New Technologies for Car Choice in Canada. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3141/2082-08
- The paper
- Bolduc, D., Boucher, N., & Alvarez-Daziano, R. (2008). Hybrid Choice Modeling of New Technologies for Car Choice in Canada. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.3141/2082-08
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.