Cited by 55

Examination of traveler responses to real-time information about bus arrivals using panel data

Zhang, Feng, Shen, Qing, Clifton, Kelly J.·2008·Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Abstract

In recent years, a considerable amount of money has been spent on intelligent transportation system projects for public transportation, most notably, real-time transit information systems. To date, strikingly few studies that have empirically investigated the effects of deployment of such a system have been completed. This paper examines the effects of real-time transit information on travelers’ behavior and psychology. The 2006-2007 University of Maryland (College Park) campus transportation panel survey data were used to examine how travelers responded to the ShuttleTrac system, a newly implemented real-time bus arrival information system for the university's shuttle service. Two fixed-effects models and five random-effects-ordered probit models were estimated to sort out the causal relations between ShuttleTrac system information use and two behavioral and five psychological indicators, respectively. It was found that use of the real-time information significantly increased the riders’ feelings of security about riding the bus after dark and boosted their overall level of satisfaction. However, it was not found to significantly increase travelers’ shuttle trip frequency, at least in the short term, perhaps because of a lack of enough time for adjustment of travel behavior. These results suggest that although transit agencies and scholars should not be too optimistic about achieving an immediate ridership increase by providing real-time information to travelers, they can expect positive psychological responses from transit riders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3141/2082-13

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The provision of LBAI can act to increase the level of passengers' perceived security and improve their overall satisfaction with bus service.

    “Increased satisfaction with bus service: the provision of LBAI can act to increase the level of passengers' perceived security and improve their overall satisfaction with bus service.”

    From The impact of real-time information on passengers’ value of bus waiting time (2018) · cites this paper as Zhang et al. (2008)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, F., Shen, Q., & Clifton, K. J.
Affiliations
School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Venue
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2008-01
Volume
2082
Issue
1
Pages
107-115
ISSN
  • 0361-1981
  • 2169-4052
Cited by
55
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review