Cited by 38Traffic control and managementTraffic and Road SafetyEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics

Effects of Individual Differences on Driving Behavior and Traffic Flow Characteristics

Rong, Jian, Mao, Kejun, Ma, Jianming·2011·Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Abstract

Studying driving behavior has been considered an important approach to identifying solutions to increase roadway level of service, reduce roadway traffic crashes, improve vehicle designs, and develop in-vehicle safety devices. The purpose of this research was to get insight into the effect of individual differences on driving behavior and traffic flow characteristics. A method of integrating driving simulators and traffic simulation was developed to investigate the effects of driving behavior on traffic flow. First, a cluster analysis was performed to classify drivers into three categories: aggressive, conservative, and moderate. Second, the driving behavior parameters of the three types of drivers were calibrated for traffic simulation models using the experimental data collected in a driving simulator. Then the effects of driving behavior on traffic flow were analyzed by traffic simulation techniques. The results show that the roadways with aggressive drivers have the highest flow rate but least traffic flow stability. Hence, to maintain roadway level of service and improve traffic safety, it is necessary to develop public training and education campaigns to reach out to aggressive drivers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3141/2248-01

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unstable traffic flow can arise from differences in cognitive and judgment abilities between AVs and non-AVs, as well as from driver behavior characteristics influenced by ODD.

    “Numerous studies have concluded that unstable traffic flow can arise from differences in cognitive and judgment abilities between AVs and non-AVs, as well as from driver behavior characteristics influenced by ODD [11][12][13].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rong, J., Mao, K., & Ma, J.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Technology (CN)
  • Texas Department of Transportation (US)
Corresponding author
Mao, Kejun
Venue
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2011-01
Volume
2248
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-4052
OpenAlex
W2139637441
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Keywords
aggressive drivers, traffic flow characteristics, traffic flow stability, driver classification, traffic simulation model calibration, driving simulator data, road safety, driver training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review