The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inferring Road Maps from Global Positioning System Traces: Survey and Comparative Evaluation
Abstract
As a result of the availability of Global Positioning System (GPS) sensors in a variety of everyday devices, GPS trace data are becoming increasingly abundant. One potential use of this wealth of data is to infer and update the geometry and connectivity of road maps through the use of what are known as map generation or map inference algorithms. These algorithms offer a tremendous advantage when no existing road map data are present. Instead of the expense of a complete road survey, GPS trace data can be used to generate entirely new sections of the road map at a fraction of the cost. In cases of existing maps, road map inference may not only help to increase the accuracy of available road maps but may also help to detect new road construction and to make dynamic adaptions to road closures—useful features for in-car navigation with digital road maps. In past research, proposed algorithms had been evaluated qualitatively with little or no comparison with prior work. This lack of quantitative and comparative evaluation is addressed in this paper with the following contributions: (a) a comprehensive survey of the current literature on map generation; (b) a description of the first method for the automatic evaluation of generated maps; (c) a qualitative, quantitative, and comparative evaluation of three reference algorithms; and (d) an open source implementation of each of the three algorithms, with a 118-h trace data set and ground truth map for unrestricted use by the automatic map generation community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
Cited by
RoadTracer: Automatic Extraction of Road Networks from Aerial Images
Bastani, F., He, S., Abbar, S., Alizadeh, M., Balakrishnan, H., Chawla, S., Madden, S., & DeWitt, D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00496 · Cited by 359
Bastani, F., He, S., Abbar, S., Alizadeh, M., Balakrishnan, H., Chawla, S., & Madden, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3274895.3274927 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Biagioni, J., & Eriksson, J.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 2291
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-71
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W2033815587
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inferring Road Maps from Global Positioning System Traces: Survey and Comparative Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3141/2291-08
- The paper
- Biagioni, J., & Eriksson, J. (2012). Inferring Road Maps from Global Positioning System Traces: Survey and Comparative Evaluation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.3141/2291-08
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.