The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethical Decision Making during Automated Vehicle Crashes
Open accessAbstract
Automated vehicles have received much attention recently, particularly the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Urban Challenge vehicles, Google's self-driving cars, and various others from auto manufacturers. These vehicles have the potential to reduce crashes and improve roadway efficiency significantly by automating the responsibilities of the driver. Still, automated vehicles are expected to crash occasionally, even when all sensors, vehicle control components, and algorithms function perfectly. If a human driver is unable to take control in time, a computer will be responsible for precrash behavior. Unlike other automated vehicles, such as aircraft, in which every collision is catastrophic, and unlike guided track systems, which can avoid collisions only in one dimension, automated roadway vehicles can predict various crash trajectory alternatives and select a path with the lowest damage or likelihood of collision. In some situations, the preferred path may be ambiguous. The study reported here investigated automated vehicle crashing and concluded the following: (a) automated vehicles would almost certainly crash, (b) an automated vehicle's decisions that preceded certain crashes had a moral component, and (c) there was no obvious way to encode complex human morals effectively in software. The paper presents a three-phase approach to develop ethical crashing algorithms; the approach consists of a rational approach, an artificial intelligence approach, and a natural language requirement. The phases are theoretical and should be implemented as the technology becomes available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Contrasting and incommensurable dimensions are likely to emerge (Goodall, 2014) when designing an algorithm to reduce the harm of a given crash.”
From Ethical principles in machine learning and artificial intelligence: cases from the field and possible ways forward (2020) · cites this paper as Goodall, 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Artificial intelligence: a modern approach
Kumar, D. A., Balasubramanian, S., Byeon, D. H., & Manerkar, P. G. V. (1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1577 · Cited by 22,191
Artificial intelligence: A modern approach
Nilsson, N. J. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(96)00007-0 · Cited by 10,730
The ethics of artificial intelligence
Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014) · The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139046855.020 · Cited by 918
Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-4493 · Cited by 799
Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009) · Oxford University Press · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374049.001.0001 · Cited by 711 · cited 3×
“Wallach and Allen refer to these techniques as “bottom-up” approaches, which can include such techniques as genetic algorithms, connectionism, and learning algorithms (38).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study: Phase II - Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment
Dingus, T. A., Klauer, S. G., Neale, V. L., Petersen, A., Lee, S. E., Sudweeks, J. D., Pérez, M. A., Hankey, J. M., Ramsey, D. J., Gupta, S., et al. (2006) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e624282011-001 · Cited by 681
Tickle, A. B., Andrews, R., Golea, M., & Diederich, J. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.728352 · Cited by 437
Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots
Arkin, R. C. (2009) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420085952 · Cited by 435
Inevitable collision states — a step towards safer robots?
Fraichard, T., & Asama, H. (2004) · Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1163/1568553042674662 · Cited by 326
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- NHTSA., 2013, Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles.
- 1998, Special Report 253: National Automated Highway System Research Program: A Review.
- Markoff J., 2007, New York Times
- Markoff J., 2010, New York Times
- GuizzoE. Toyota's Semi-Autonomous Car Will Keep You Safe. IEEE Spectrum Automation, Jan. 8, 2013. http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/artifcial-intelligence/toyota-semi-autonomous-lexus-car-will-keep-you-safe. Accessed June 27, 2013.
- Bilger B., 2013, New Yorker
- 2012, Vehicles Involved in Crashes by Vehicle Type, Rollover Occurrence, and Crash Severity: 2009.
- NHTSA., 2009, Traffic Safety Facts 2009: A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System.
- 2011, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets
- Beavers A. F., 2011, Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implication on Robotics
- Evans L., 2004, Traffic Safety.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
de Winter, J., Happee, R., Martens, M., & Stanton, N. A. (2014) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.016 · Cited by 793
A Review of Motion Planning for Highway Autonomous Driving
Claussmann, L., Revilloud, M., Gruyer, D., & Glaser, S. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2019.2913998 · Cited by 678
The governance of smart mobility
Docherty, I., Marsden, G. R., & Anable, J. (2017) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.012 · Cited by 533
Incorporating Ethics into Artificial Intelligence
Etzioni, A., & Etzioni, O. (2017) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-017-9252-2 · Cited by 388
Public acceptance and perception of autonomous vehicles: a comprehensive review
Othman, K. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00041-8 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodall, N. J.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Transportation Research Council (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goodall, Noah J.
- ORCID
- Goodall, Noah J.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 2424
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-65
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W2118960450
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 22.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Virginia
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicles, ethical decision-making, traffic accidents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
