The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development of California Regulations to Govern Testing and Operation of Automated Driving Systems
Abstract
Higher levels of road vehicle automation pose a regulatory challenge in the United States. At the national level, NHTSA has been responsible for ensuring vehicle safety through the mandatory Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and the voluntary New Car Assessment Program. Although NHTSA typically regulates the technology aspects of vehicle safety, state agencies, such as the department of motor vehicles, are responsible for the regulations governing training, evaluation, and licensing of drivers and the registration of vehicles. Automation that allows drivers to disengage from monitoring and control tasks introduces safety concerns related to the vehicle technology (typically regulated by NHTSA) and to the automated vehicle's driving behavior and compliance with vehicle codes (typically regulated by states). Issues that need to be addressed in support of state regulations for manufacturers' testing of automated vehicles on public roads and the general public's operation of automated driving systems are detailed. The key challenges for these regulations are how to ensure public safety without discouraging technical innovations and how to define meaningful requirements in the absence of existing technical standards for automated driving systems. The topics covered include regulatory models of certification, driver training and licensing requirements, and a discussion of the distinction between behavioral competency (how well the automation handles the environment) and functi…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AV legislation and policies in the US, the Netherlands, the UK and Sweden are paving the way for other countries.
“AV legislation and policies in the US, the Netherlands, the UK and Sweden are paving the way for other countries”
From Understanding autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review on capability, impact, planning and policy (2019) · cites this paper as Nowakowski et al., 2015, Vellinga, 2017
These two main challenges are linked with devising regulations in this particular area to ensure safety without hindering innovation, and defining meaningful requirements or standards without having such technical standards for ADS in place.
“These two main challenges are linked with devising regulations in this particular area to ensure safety without hindering innovation, and defining meaningful requirements or standards without having such technical standards for ADS in place”
From Understanding autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review on capability, impact, planning and policy (2019) · cites this paper as Nowakowski et al., 2015
Higher level of vehicle automation poses regulatory challenges for the AV manufacturing countries.
“Higher level of vehicle automation poses regulatory challenges for the AV manufacturing countries”
From Understanding autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review on capability, impact, planning and policy (2019) · cites this paper as Nowakowski, Shladover, Chan, & Tan 2015
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Geddes N. B., 1940, Magic Motorways.
- SmithB. W. Automated Vehicles Are Probably Legal in the United States. White Paper. Center for Internet and Society, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 2012. http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/publications/automated-vehicles-are-probably-legal-united-states. · DOI
- AlessandriniA. CityMobil2: Automated Road Transport Systems in European Cities. Presented at Second Annual Workshop on Road Vehicle Automation, Stanford, Calif., Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013. http://www.vehicleautomation.org.
- Bosch Media Service. Automated Driving: Bosch Carries Out Tests on German Roads (press release). Farmington Hills, Mich., May 3, 2013. http://www.bosch-presse.de/presseforum/details.htm?txtID=6235.
- Kriso S., 2012, Executive Summary: Functional Safety in Accordance with ISO 26262.
- CityMobil2 Project, 2013, Functional Specifications of Vehicles and Related Services.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Faisal, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., & Currie, G. (2019) · Journal of Transport and Land Use · doi:10.5198/jtlu.2019.1405 · Cited by 427
“As an example, AV legislation and policies in the US, the Netherlands, the UK and Sweden are paving the way for other countries (Nowakowski et al., 2015, Vellinga, 2017).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Nowakowski, C., Shladover, S. E., Chan, C.-Y., & Tan, H.-S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nowakowski, Christopher
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 2489
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 137-144
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W2345054361
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Keywords
- autonomous driving, California, public road testing, driver licensing, driver training, certification, functional safety, vehicle safety standards, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, public safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review