Cited by 46Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyTraffic and Road Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Development of California Regulations to Govern Testing and Operation of Automated Driving Systems

Nowakowski, Christopher, Shladover, Steven E., Chan, Ching-Yao, Tan, Han-Shue·2015·Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Abstract

Higher levels of road vehicle automation pose a regulatory challenge in the United States. At the national level, NHTSA has been responsible for ensuring vehicle safety through the mandatory Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and the voluntary New Car Assessment Program. Although NHTSA typically regulates the technology aspects of vehicle safety, state agencies, such as the department of motor vehicles, are responsible for the regulations governing training, evaluation, and licensing of drivers and the registration of vehicles. Automation that allows drivers to disengage from monitoring and control tasks introduces safety concerns related to the vehicle technology (typically regulated by NHTSA) and to the automated vehicle's driving behavior and compliance with vehicle codes (typically regulated by states). Issues that need to be addressed in support of state regulations for manufacturers' testing of automated vehicles on public roads and the general public's operation of automated driving systems are detailed. The key challenges for these regulations are how to ensure public safety without discouraging technical innovations and how to define meaningful requirements in the absence of existing technical standards for automated driving systems. The topics covered include regulatory models of certification, driver training and licensing requirements, and a discussion of the distinction between behavioral competency (how well the automation handles the environment) and functi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3141/2489-16

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Geddes N. B., 1940, Magic Motorways.
  2. SmithB. W. Automated Vehicles Are Probably Legal in the United States. White Paper. Center for Internet and Society, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 2012. http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/publications/automated-vehicles-are-probably-legal-united-states. · DOI
  3. AlessandriniA. CityMobil2: Automated Road Transport Systems in European Cities. Presented at Second Annual Workshop on Road Vehicle Automation, Stanford, Calif., Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013. http://www.vehicleautomation.org.
  4. Bosch Media Service. Automated Driving: Bosch Carries Out Tests on German Roads (press release). Farmington Hills, Mich., May 3, 2013. http://www.bosch-presse.de/presseforum/details.htm?txtID=6235.
  5. Kriso S., 2012, Executive Summary: Functional Safety in Accordance with ISO 26262.
  6. CityMobil2 Project, 2013, Functional Specifications of Vehicles and Related Services.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nowakowski, C., Shladover, S. E., Chan, C.-Y., & Tan, H.-S.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Nowakowski, Christopher
Venue
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2015-01
Volume
2489
Issue
1
Pages
137-144
ISSN
  • 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-4052
OpenAlex
W2345054361
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
Keywords
autonomous driving, California, public road testing, driver licensing, driver training, certification, functional safety, vehicle safety standards, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, public safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review