Cited by 84Traffic control and managementTransportation Planning and OptimizationEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics

Intersection auctions and reservation-based control in dynamic traffic assignment

Levin, Michael W., Boyles, Stephen D.·2015·Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Abstract

Autonomous vehicle (AV) technology is maturing, and AVs are being test-driven on public roads. A promising intersection control policy, tile-based reservation (TBR), proposed by Dresner and Stone in 2004, could improve intersection capacity beyond the capabilities of optimized traffic signals. Although TBR has been studied in several microsimulation models, it has yet to be analyzed under user equilibrium behavior. In this study, TBR was modeled in the dynamic traffic assignment to draw on the extensive literature on vehicle routing behaviors. With the proposed model, TBR can be computationally simulated on large city networks, with the goal of solving the traffic assignment problem. TBR also arbitrarily prioritizes vehicle movement, and high-value-of-time travelers may be able to gain priority through intersection auctions, as suggested by the literature. An in-depth study of simple intersection auctions found that much of the benefit (over first-come, first-served prioritization) resulted from the randomizing effect of auctions giving larger queues of vehicles greater shares of the intersection capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3141/2497-04

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eventually, when there are no human drivers, traffic lights, give way signs, street signs, speed limit signs, and much other physical infrastructure will no longer be necessary, being replaced with digital versions in a cloud; cars will adjust speeds automatically and bid for the right to cross intersections in an electronic auction.

    “Eventually, when there are no human drivers, traffic lights, give way signs, street signs, speed limit signs, and a good deal of other physical infrastructure will no longer be necessary, being replaced with digital versions in a 'cloud': cars will adjust their speeds automatically to safely handle road and traffic conditions and will 'bid' for the right to cross intersections at a particular time”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levin, M. W., & Boyles, S. D.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Levin, Michael W.
Venue
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2015-01
Volume
2497
Issue
1
Pages
35-44
ISSN
  • 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-4052
OpenAlex
W560574324
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Keywords
dynamic traffic assignment, autonomous vehicles, user equilibrium, vehicle routing, intersection capacity, value of time, traffic signal control, queueing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review