Intersection auctions and reservation-based control in dynamic traffic assignment
Abstract
Autonomous vehicle (AV) technology is maturing, and AVs are being test-driven on public roads. A promising intersection control policy, tile-based reservation (TBR), proposed by Dresner and Stone in 2004, could improve intersection capacity beyond the capabilities of optimized traffic signals. Although TBR has been studied in several microsimulation models, it has yet to be analyzed under user equilibrium behavior. In this study, TBR was modeled in the dynamic traffic assignment to draw on the extensive literature on vehicle routing behaviors. With the proposed model, TBR can be computationally simulated on large city networks, with the goal of solving the traffic assignment problem. TBR also arbitrarily prioritizes vehicle movement, and high-value-of-time travelers may be able to gain priority through intersection auctions, as suggested by the literature. An in-depth study of simple intersection auctions found that much of the benefit (over first-come, first-served prioritization) resulted from the randomizing effect of auctions giving larger queues of vehicles greater shares of the intersection capacity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Eventually, when there are no human drivers, traffic lights, give way signs, street signs, speed limit signs, and much other physical infrastructure will no longer be necessary, being replaced with digital versions in a cloud; cars will adjust speeds automatically and bid for the right to cross intersections in an electronic auction.
“Eventually, when there are no human drivers, traffic lights, give way signs, street signs, speed limit signs, and a good deal of other physical infrastructure will no longer be necessary, being replaced with digital versions in a 'cloud': cars will adjust their speeds automatically to safely handle road and traffic conditions and will 'bid' for the right to cross intersections at a particular time”
From When human beings are like drunk robots: Driverless vehicles, ethics, and the future of transport (2017) · cites this paper as Levin and Boyles, 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When human beings are like drunk robots: Driverless vehicles, ethics, and the future of transport
Sparrow, R., & Howard, M. (2017) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2017.04.014 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
- Authors
- Levin, M. W., & Boyles, S. D.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Levin, Michael W.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 2497
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-44
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W560574324
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
- Keywords
- dynamic traffic assignment, autonomous vehicles, user equilibrium, vehicle routing, intersection capacity, value of time, traffic signal control, queueing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review