Taxonomy of shared autonomous vehicle fleet management problems to inform future transportation mobility
Abstract
This paper presents a taxonomy for classifying vehicle fleet management problems, across several dimensions, to inform future research on autonomous vehicle (AV) fleets. Modeling the AV fleet management problem will bring about new classes of vehicle routing, scheduling, and fleet management problems; nevertheless, the existing literature related to vehicle routing, scheduling, and fleet management is a valuable foundation for future research on the AV fleet management problem. This paper classifies the broadly defined AV fleet management problem by using existing taxonomic categories in the literature; adds additional, or more nuanced, dimensions to existing taxonomic categories; and presents new taxonomic categories to classify specific AV fleet management problems. The broadly defined AV fleet management problem can be classified as a dynamic multivehicle pickup and delivery problem with explicit or implicit time window constraints. Existing studies that fit into this class of fleet management problems are reviewed. New taxonomy categories presented in this paper include fleet size elasticity, reservation structure, accept–reject decision maker, reservation time frame, ridesharing, vehicle repositioning, underlying network structure, and network congestion. Two goals of the taxonomy presented in this study are to provide researchers with a valuable reference as they begin to model AV fleet management problems and to present novel AV fleet management problems to spur intere…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a lack of research in terms of fleet size elasticity, short-term car-sharing system and dynamic pricing structure.
“Hyland & Mahmassani (2017) point out the lack of research in terms of fleet size elasticity, short-term car-sharing system and dynamic pricing structure.”
From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Hyland & Mahmassani (2017)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Hyland, M. F., & Mahmassani, H. S.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mahmassani, Hani S.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 2653
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-34
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W2597851987
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicle fleets, fleet management, taxonomy (general classification scheme), vehicle routing, vehicle scheduling, time windows, ride-sharing, vehicle repositioning, network congestion, transportation mobility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review