Cited by 0Renin-Angiotensin System StudiesBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHormonal Regulation and Hypertension

Comparative Effects of Losartan and Amlodipine on Activities of Sympathetic Nerve, Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone System and Brain Natriuretic Peptide in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients.

Open access
Tsutamoto, Takayoshi, Maeda, Keiko, Mabuchi, Naoko, Tsutsui, Takashi, Ohnishi, Masato, Kinoshita, Masahiko·2002·Nippon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. Japanese Journal of Geriatrics

Abstract

This study investigated the comparative effects of losartan and amlodipine on the activation of the sympathetic nervous system, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (R-A-A system) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients with essential hypertension. Twenty-four elderly patients who had received more than 12 months of antihypertensive treatment with amlodipine participated in this study. The treatment regimen of 5 mg/day amlodipine was changed to 50 mg/day losartan. Plasma catecholamines (norepinephrine, epinephrine and dopamine), active renin, aldosterone and BNP concentration were measured before and after an average of 5 months of losartan treatment. After losartan treatment, blood pressures were not changed, suggesting the comparable effect of 50 mg losartan and 5 mg amlodipine on elevated blood pressure. Losartan significantly reduced norepinephrine (799 +/- 277 pg/mL vs. 692 +/- 268 pg/mL, p < 0.05) and aldosterone concentration (81.2 +/- 35.3 pg/mL vs. 55.2 +/- 17.7 pg/mL, p < 0.01), whereas there were not any changes in BNP concentrations. These findings suggested that losartan might be superior to amlodipine in prevention of chronic or intermittent sympathetic hyperactivity and enhanced R-A-A system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3143/geriatrics.39.303

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19

Authors
Tsutamoto, T., Maeda, K., Mabuchi, N., Tsutsui, T., Ohnishi, M., & Kinoshita, M.
Affiliations
Shiga University of Medical Science (JP)
Venue
Nippon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. Japanese Journal of Geriatrics
Published
2002
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
303-307
ISSN
0300-9173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W278762930
Cited by
0
References
19
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
ja
Open access
Locations
  • Nippon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi Japanese Journal of Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Keywords
losartan, amlodipine, essential hypertension, elderly patients, sympathetic nervous system, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, brain natriuretic peptide, plasma catecholamines, norepinephrine, aldosterone, antihypertensive therapy, blood pressure
MeSH terms
Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Calcium Channel Blockers, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypertension, Renin-Angiotensin System, Sympathetic Nervous System, Amlodipine, Losartan, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review