Cited by 5Cybersecurity and Information SystemsAccess Control and TrustNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comprehensive Review of Zero Trust Network Architecture (ZTNA) and Deployment Frameworks

Open access
Senan Mahmod Attar Bashi, Zainab, Senan, Shayma·2025·International Journal on Perceptive and Cognitive Computing

Abstract

The zero trust (ZT) approach has initiated significant advancements in network security, addressing the limitations of traditional security models. Traditional network security approaches have faced challenges adapting to modern trends such as bring your own device (BYOD) and cloud computing, resulting in increased complexity in meeting new security requirements. The zero trust security model operates on the principle that no entity within the network, whether internal or external, is inherently trusted. Therefore, all users and devices must undergo strict authentication and authorization processes prior to accessing organizational resources. This review paper provides a comprehensive analysis of zero trust network architecture (ZTNA) and outlines a general deployment framework model, highlighting the critical role of zero trust in modern network security.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31436/ijpcc.v11i1.494

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]6. B. Mixon-Baca, J. Knockel, D. Xue, T. Ayyagari, D. Kapur, R. Ensafi, and J. Crandall, "Attacking Connection Tracking Frameworks as Used by Virtual Private Networks," Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, vol. 2024, pp. 109-126, 2024, doi: 10.56553/popets- 2024-0070. · DOI
  2. [8]8. M. Wa Nkongolo and M. Tokmak, "Zero-Day Threats Detection for Critical Infrastructures," arXiv preprint, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.06366. · DOI
  3. [13]13. M. Jhaveri and V. Parmar, "CLOUD Security Information and Event Management," GIS-Zeitschrift fü Geoinformatik, vol. 10, pp. 13, 2023.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Senan Mahmod Attar Bashi, Z., & Senan, S.
Affiliations
International Islamic University Malaysia (MY)
Venue
International Journal on Perceptive and Cognitive Computing
Publisher
IIUM Press
Published
2025-01-30
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
148-153
ISSN
2462-229X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407284685
Cited by
5
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal on Perceptive and Cognitive Computing (publishedVersion)
  • The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cybersecurity and Information Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Access Control and Trust
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
network security, authentication, authorization, Bring Your Own Device, cloud security, deployment framework, access control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review