Cited by 9COVID-19 Prevention and ImpactCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Knowledge, Attitudes And Practices Towards COVID-19 among Medical Students in International Islamic University Malaysia: An Online Cross-Sectional Study

Open access
Abd Rahim, Ikhlas Solehah, Roslan, Muhammad Badrul Nizam, Mohamad Zaini, Nur Najihah, Kasim, Nur Syazwani, Mohd Yazid, Muhammad Izz Hilmi, Pasi, Hafizah, Nasreen, Hashima E·2021·IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pandemic has caused a major impact to global public health including one of the high risk groups which is the medical students. This study was intended to assess knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) towards COVID-19 among medical students in International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM). MATERIAL AND METHOD: An online cross-sectional study was conducted among 438 medical students of IIUM from 6th July 2020 to 9th July 2020. KAP towards COVID-19 was measured using a structured Malay and English version questionnaire consisting of 13 items on knowledge, 3 items on attitudes and 3 items on practices. RESULTS: The average correct response rate on knowledge was 85.4%. Only 12.1% of the students had correct knowledge on all items, and 1 in every 4 and 5 students had misconceptions on the clinical features and transmission of COVID-19. In term of attitudes towards COVID-19, majority of the respondents believed that COVID-19 would be effectively controlled (85%) and had faith that Malaysia could overcome the war against COVID-19 (99%). Most of the respondents practiced good towards COVID-19 in avoiding crowded places (90%), wearing face masks (95%) and practicing hand hygiene (91.6%). CONCLUSION: Although the results are positive towards KAP, only 1 in every 10 students responded correctly to all knowledge questions, and few proportions had misconceptions on the disease and did not maintain adequate practices. Policies aimed at appropriate health promotion activities may ensure empowering the medical students with adequate knowledge on all aspects of COVID-19, and practice properly following the standard operating procedure implemented by the government.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31436/imjm.v20i2.1686

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

  • A Critical Appraisal of COVID-19 in Malaysia and Beyond

    Editorial Board Member, M. J. O. M. S., Abdullah, J. M., Brain Behaviour Cluster and Department of Neurosciences, S. O. M. S., Wan Ismail, W. F. N., Editorial Board Member, M. J. O. M. S., Department of Orthopaedics, S. O. M. S., Mohamad, I., Editorial Board Member, M. J. O. M. S., Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, S. O. M. S., Ab Razak, A., et al. (2020) · Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.21315/mjms2020.27.2.1 · Cited by 69 · see citing works

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Zhong B, Luo W, Li H, Zhang Q, Liu X, Li W et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2020;16:1745-1752.
  2. Shereen MA, Khan S, Kazmi A, Bashir N, Siddique R. COVID-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. Journal of Advanced Research. 2020;24:91-98.
  3. Sadiq A, Muhammad S, Saleem, et al. How COVID -19 is Changing Behaviours of Population: A Study from Punjab. Biomedica. 2020;36:253-259.
  4. Tao N. An analysis on reasons of SARS-induced psychological panic among students. Journal of Anhui Institute of Education. 2003; 21:78-9.
  5. Saefi M, Fauzi A, Kristiana E, et al. Survey data of COVID-19-related knowledge, attitude, and practices among indonesian undergraduate students. Data in Brief. 2020;31:105855.
  6. Peng Y, Pei C, Zheng Y, et al. A cross-sectional survey of knowledge, attitude and practice associated with COVID-19 among undergraduate students in China. BMC Public Health. 2020;2:1292.
  7. Khasawneh AI, Humeidan AA, Alsulaiman JW, et al. Medical Students and COVID-19: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Precautionary Measures. A Descriptive Study From Jordan. Frontiers in Public Health. 2020;8:253.
  8. Salman M, Mustafa ZU, Asif N, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and preventive practices related to COVID-19: A cross-sectional study in two Pakistani university populations. Springer Link. 2020;36:319-325.
  9. Shi Y, Wang J, Yang Y, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of medical staff in Chinese psychiatric hospitals regarding COVID-19. Brain, Behavior, & Immunity-Health. 2020;29:100064.
  10. Alzoubi H, Alnawaiseh N, Al-Mnayyis A, et al. COVID-19-knowledge, attitude and practice among medical and non-medical University Students in Jordan. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2020;14:17-24.
  11. Lau LL, Hung N, Go DJ, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of COVID-19 among income-poor households in the Philippines: A cross -sectional study. J Glob Health 2020;10:011007.
  12. Azlan AA, Hamzah MR, Sern TJ, Ayub SH, Mohamad E. Public knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19: A cross-sectional study in Malaysia. Plos One. 2020;15:1-15.
  13. Taghrir MH, Borazjani R, Shiraly R. COVID-19 and Iranian Medical Students; A Survey on Their Related-Knowledge, Preventive Behaviors and Risk Perception. Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2020 1;23:249-54.
  14. Olum R, Kajjimu J, Kanyike AM, et al. Perspective of medical students on the COVID-19 pandemic: Survey of nine medical schools in Uganda. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 2020;6:e19847.
  15. Maheshwari S, Gupta PK, Sinha R, Rawat P. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among medical students: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Acute Disease. 2020;9:100.
  16. Begum F. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices towards COVID-19 among B.Sc. Nursing Students in Selected Nursing Institution in Saudi Arabia during COVID-19 Outbreak: An Online Survey. Saudi Journal of Nursing and Health Care. 2020;3:194-198.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abd Rahim, I. S., Roslan, M. B. N., Mohamad Zaini, N. N., Kasim, N. S., Mohd Yazid, M. I. H., Pasi, H., & Nasreen, H. E.
Affiliations
International Islamic University Malaysia (MY)
Venue
IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia
Publisher
IIUM Press
Published
2021-04-01
Volume
20
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1823-4631 (ISSN-L)
  • 2735-2285
OpenAlex
W3146183759
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia (publishedVersion)
  • The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
International Islamic University Malaysia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, knowledge, attitudes and practices, medical students, health misconceptions, masking, hand hygiene, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, health promotion, pandemic response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review