Assessment of Nutritional Adequacy of Packaged Gluten-free Food Products
Abstract
Purpose There is concern about the nutritional quality of processed gluten-free (GF) products. The aim was to investigate the nutrient composition and cost of processed GF products compared with similar regular products. Methods Product size, price, caloric value, and macro- and micronutrient composition were compared between foods labeled "Gluten-free" and comparable regular products in 5 grocery stores in 3 Canadian cities. Data were calculated per 100 g of product. Results A total of 131 products were studied (71 GF, 60 regular). Overall, calories were comparable between GF and regular foods. However, fat content of GF breads was higher (mean 7.7 vs. 3.6 g, P = 0.003), whereas protein was lower (mean 5.0 vs. 8.0 g, P = 0.001). Mean carbohydrate content of GF pasta was higher (78 vs. 74 g, P = 0.001), whereas protein (7.5 vs. 13.3 g, P Conclusions Some commonly consumed packaged GF foods are higher in fat and carbohydrates and lower in protein, iron, and folate compared with regular products. GF products are more expensive. Dietitians should counsel patients on the GF diet regarding its nutritional and financial impact.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some naturally gluten-free food sources are poor in minerals such as iron, calcium and magnesium, and industrial food processing may further reduce the level of micronutrients.
“Some naturally gluten-free food sources are poor in minerals such as iron, calcium and magnesium, and industrial food processing may further reduce the level of micronutrients (96,97).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Luque, V., Crespo‐Escobar, P., Hård af Segerstad, E. M., Koltai, T., Norsa, L., Roman, E., Vreugdenhil, A., Fueyo‐Díaz, R., & Ribes‐Koninckx, C. (2024) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1002/jpn3.12079 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kulai, T., & Rashid, M.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
- Publisher
- Dietitians of Canada
- Published
- 2014-12-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 186-190
- ISSN
- 1486-3847 (ISSN-L)
- 2292-9592
- OpenAlex
- W2316605677
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Keywords
- gluten-free foods, nutritional adequacy, processed foods, gluten-free bread, gluten-free pasta, macronutrient composition, micronutrient content, iron, folic acid, dietary fiber, fat content, protein content, food costs, celiac disease, nutrition counseling
- MeSH terms
- Bread, British Columbia, Edible Grain, Costs and Cost Analysis, Flour, Food Labeling, Frozen Foods, Humans, Meat Products, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Nutritive Value, Diet, Gluten-Free, Fast Foods, Diet, High-Fat, Serving Size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review