Carbon Dioxide Uptake in Demolished and Crushed Concrete
Open accessAbstract
One of the largest contributors of the greenhouse gas emission is the production of cement for use in concrete. However, concrete is well-known for its carbon dioxide (CO2) uptake by carbonation. The purpose of this study was to consider the CO2 uptake in demolished and crushed concrete. In this study, three kinds of experiments and survey were carried out, including (1) an experiment using mortar specimens made in the laboratory so as to identify the conditions that accelerate CO2 uptake, (2) an experiment using concrete obtained from the demolition site and (3) a survey on the CO2 uptake in recycled crusher-run stone obtained from recycling plants. The experiment on new mortar and demolished concrete pointed out that the CO2 uptake in cement hydrate increases significantly when the particles are relatively small and when they are alternately wetted and dried. Furthermore, the survey on concrete at recycling plants found the amount of CO2 uptake in one ton of recycled crusher-run stone to be approximately 11 kilograms. Finally, using this value, the life cycle of CO2 of concrete structures was calculated and shown to be approximately 5.5% less when the CO2 uptake is taken into account compared to when it is not taken into account.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RCA with small particle sizes appears to have a high CO2 sequestration capacity.
“In general, RCA with small particle sizes appears to have a high CO 2 sequestration capacity [56,81].”
From An overview of utilizing CO2 for accelerated carbonation treatment in the concrete industry (2022) · cites this paper as [56]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 2 · Cited by 155
- Authors
- Kikuchi, T., & Kuroda, Y.
- Affiliations
- Shimizu (Japan) (JP)
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology
- Publisher
- Japan Concrete Institute
- Published
- 2011-02-23
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-124
- ISSN
- 1346-8014 (ISSN-L)
- 1347-3913
- OpenAlex
- W2065808818
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Waseda University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete Corrosion and Durability
- Keywords
- CO2 absorption, concrete carbonation, demolished concrete, crushed concrete, recycled aggregate, cement hydrates, particle size, wetting-drying cycles, greenhouse gas emissions, concrete recycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review