Cited by 44Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFossil Insects in Amber

A new basal coelurosaur (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Middle Jurassic of Siberia

Open access
Averianov, A.O., Krasnolutskii, S.A., Ivantsov, S.V.·2010·Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS

Abstract

Kileskus aristotocus gen. et sp. nov. from the Middle Jurassic (Bathonian) Itat Formation at Berezovsk Quarry, Krasnoyarsk Territory (West Siberia, Russia), is based on an associated maxilla and premaxilla, a mandible fragment, and some possible associated postcranial elements. Kileskus gen. nov. is referred together with the Middle Jurassic Proceratosaurus from England and the Late Jurassic Guanlong from China to Proceratosauridae fam. nov. (Tyrannosauroidea, Coelurosauria) which is characterized by sagittal nasal crest (unknown for Kileskus gen. nov.), enlarged external nares, short ventral margin of premaxilla, and depth of the antorbital fossa ventral to the antorbital fenestra that is much greater than the depth of the maxilla below the ventral margin of the antorbital fossa. Kileskus gen. nov. is more similar to Proceratosaurus than to Guanlong in having anterodorsal process of the premaxilla inclined slightly anterodorsally and nares inclined posterodorsally, but differs from these two genera by having ascending process of the maxilla confluent with anterior rim of maxillary body and gently sloping posterodorsally. Kileskus gen. nov. has a basal position within the Proceratosauridae. Dilong from the Early Cretaceous of China with a parasagittal nasal crests is the sister taxon for the Proceratosauridae. The new taxon is one of the oldest members of Coelurosauria and Tyrannosauroidea in the fossil record.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31610/trudyzin/2010.314.1.42

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Averianov, A. O., Krasnolutskii, S. A., & Ivantsov, S. V.
Affiliations
  • Zoological Institute (RU)
  • Sharypovo Regional Museum, 2nd microrayon 10, Sharypovo, 662311 Krasnoyarsk Territory, Russia
  • National Research Tomsk State University (RU)
Venue
Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS
Published
2010-03-25
Volume
314
Issue
1
Pages
42-57
ISSN
0206-0477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2740747050
Cited by
44
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
ru
Open access
Locations
Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Saint Petersburg State University
  • National Museum of Natural History
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
Keywords
Tyrannosauroidea, Coelurosauria, theropod dinosaurs, new genus and species, Middle Jurassic, Bathonian, maxilla, premaxilla, mandible, phylogenetic relationships, Western Siberia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review