The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Sacred and the Museum: Repatriation and the Trajectories of Inalienable Possessions
Abstract
Since the formation of museum anthropology, scholars have been interested in collecting Native American objects of religious and spiritual significance. For many years, these objects predominately served scientific inquiry and public curiosity, but over the last three decades scholars have become increasingly aware of how indigenous communities continue to value these objects despite their radical recontextualization. This article seeks to bring together two concepts—Arjun Appadurai's “trajectories” and Annette Weiner's “inalienable possessions”—to examine how objects come to express particular forms of sacredness. By following the cultural routes of the Zuni Ahayu:da (War Gods), in part through the lens of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science, we can trace what Appadurai calls “diversion” and what Wiener terms the “dilemma of loss.” Diversion and loss caused by antiquities dealers, collectors, and curators have been particularly troublesome for Zunis because the War Gods constitute a unique form of sacred object, a singular type of possession that is intrinsically sacred. Understanding the trajectories of the things taken, returned, and still held by museums will better enable scholars and tribal communities to articulate how sacred objects in museums continue to have power and salience.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A clear consensus among the gathered NAGPRA practitioners was that the law had finally caught up to best practice standards.
“A clear consensus among the group was that the law had finally caught up to “best practice” standards, a sentiment also expressed in scholarly discourse (Colwell 2014).”
From Perspectives, Policies, and Practices: Challenges and Pathways for Culturally Sensitive Collections Care (2025) · cites this paper as Colwell 2014
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bowers, K. J., & Elmore, J. R. (2025) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2025.10098 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Colwell, C.
- Venue
- Museum Worlds
- Publisher
- Berghahn Books
- Published
- 2014-01-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2049-6729
- 2049-6737
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review