The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Re-siting corporate responsibility
Abstract
The bottom-of-the-pyramid (BOP) approach is championed as a way to deliver both corporate profits and poverty reduction. This article explores how “the poor” are repurposed as the instruments of ethical capitalism through the archetypal BOP model—Avon Cosmetics. A harbinger of “compassionate capitalism,” Avon has long stylized its entrepreneurial opportunity as a channel to a transcendent realm of self-actualization and social transformation. The company pursues this vision through a set of discourses and calculative practices that aim to produce industrious, self-disciplined, and empowered “entrepreneurs.” However, while BOP systems like Avon may provide a viable income stream for “poor” women, the practices through which women are “converted” into enterprising subjects can confound their intended “empowerment” effects. The article suggests that while targeting the “bottom of the pyramid” may elide the distinction between the maximization of profit and the imperatives of sustainable development, devolving corporate social responsibility (CSR) to the “entrepreneurial poor” raises questions about the implications of “making poverty business.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Project Insansa workers assume a range of risks that in other circumstances would be taken care of by 'formal' institutions, including both the state and the firm (Dolan and Johnstone-Louis, 2011).”
From Remote (Dis)engagement: Shifting Corporate Risk to the ‘Bottom of the Pyramid’ (2021) · cites this paper as Dolan and Johnstone-Louis, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty
Ong, A. (2006) · doi:10.1215/9780822387879 · Cited by 3,906
Citizenship Prepaid: Water, Calculability, and Techno-Politics in South Africa*
von Schnitzler, A. (2008) · Journal of Southern African Studies · doi:10.1080/03057070802456821 · Cited by 388
Cited by
Dolan, C., & Rajak, D. (2016) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2015.1126249 · Cited by 144
Self-citationRemote (Dis)engagement: Shifting Corporate Risk to the ‘Bottom of the Pyramid’
Roll, K., Dolan, C., & Rajak, D. (2021) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/dech.12669 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dolan, C., & Johnstone-Louis, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford catherine.dolan@sbs.ox.ac.uk
- University of Oxford mary.johnstone@sbs.ox.ac.uk
- Venue
- Focaal
- Publisher
- Berghahn Books
- Published
- 2011-06-01
- Volume
- 2011
- Issue
- 60
- Pages
- 21-33
- ISSN
- 0920-1297
- 1558-5263
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Re-siting corporate responsibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3167/fcl.2011.600103
- The paper
- Dolan, C., & Johnstone-Louis, M. (2011). Re-siting corporate responsibility. Focaal. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2011.600103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.