The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detachment as a corporate ethic
Abstract
This article examines efforts by De Beers, the world’s largest supplier of rough diamonds, to better regulate the conditions under which its stones are cut and polished across a global network of buyers, contractors, and subcontractors. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork at an offshore processing unit in South India that was built to service De Beers’ buyers, this article explores how ethical accounting regimes are materialized on the floor of a global factory and how they are grounded in an industrial bureaucracy. In a global supply chain like this one, I argue, codes of practice and audit checklists demand to be understood as material technologies that afford companies and individuals new purchase on an ethic of detachment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The programme's embrace of remote (dis)engagement and entrepreneurialism, which are premised on an 'ethic of detachment' (Cross, 2011), do nothing to advance real market inclusion, where workers' rights and protections are upheld by labour regulations.”
From Remote (Dis)engagement: Shifting Corporate Risk to the ‘Bottom of the Pyramid’ (2021) · cites this paper as Cross, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Friedner, M. (2015) · Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute · doi:10.1111/1467-9655.12208 · Cited by 34
The Coming of the Corporate Gift
Cross, J. (2014) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276413499191 · Cited by 31
Self-citationRemote (Dis)engagement: Shifting Corporate Risk to the ‘Bottom of the Pyramid’
Roll, K., Dolan, C., & Rajak, D. (2021) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/dech.12669 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Cross, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh jamiejcross@gmail.com
- Venue
- Focaal
- Publisher
- Berghahn Books
- Published
- 2011-06-01
- Volume
- 2011
- Issue
- 60
- Pages
- 34-46
- ISSN
- 0920-1297
- 1558-5263
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
