The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Governing through paperwork
Abstract
Documents play an important role in the lives of refugees. However, little is known about the extent to which documents regulate the everyday lives of refugees and the anxieties of obtaining relevant paperwork for refugees seeking resettlement in the Global North. Although their lives are regulated by paperwork, refugees also use documents strategically to legitimise various claims and entitlements. This article shows how refugees interface with the administrative processes that seek to regulate their stay. Therefore, documentary practices become important tools through which processes and objectives of migration governance can be examined. This article seeks to contribute further insights on how the deployment of documents entrenches discourses of vulnerability, the role that paper regimes play in (re)producing processes of exclusion through administrative processes in humanitarian aid contexts and the revelations of documentary practices or paper regimes about those who govern and those who are governed by these practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rafa, N., Khalid, R., & Uddin, S. M. N. (2024) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103621 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakueira, S.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Nakueira, Sophie
- Venue
- Journal of Legal Anthropology
- Publisher
- Berghahn Books
- Published
- 2019-12-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 10-28
- ISSN
- 1758-9576 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-9584
- OpenAlex
- W3011395369
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Legal Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Law › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
- Keywords
- refugees, documents, paperwork, migration governance, documentary practice, refugee resettlement, humanitarian aid, vulnerability, exclusion, administrative processes, entitlement, Global North
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review