The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Rise and Fall of the Segway
Abstract
Once posited as a revolutionary transportation technology, the Segway never took off as some expected because the social acceptance of the technology was not considered in a systematic manner. Using a framework for social acceptance of technology borrowed from the literature on renewable energy, we examine how social, economic, and environmental costs of the Segway, along with regulatory issues presented barriers to implementation. High prices, legislative and spatial issues, and a lack of appeal to consumers presented challenges to acceptance. This case study provides a timely reminder of the multifaceted and complex nature of social acceptance that will need to be applied to future innovations, such as autonomous vehicles, to better understand factors that need to be considered for them to be embraced by society.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, the world is full of inventions that did not go far (e.g., The Segway [24]).”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boglietti, S., Barabino, B., & Maternini, G. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13073692 · Cited by 114
“Clark, Atkinson-Palombo & Garrick [55] showed that high prices, legislative and spatial issues, and a lack of appeal to consumers presented challenges to e-PMVs acceptance.”
BackgroundThe Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda
Jackson, V., Vasilescu, B., Russo, D., Ralph, P., Prikladnicki, R., Izadi, M., D’Angelo, S., Inman, S., Andrade, A., & van der Hoek, A. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3708523 · Cited by 23
Hopes and fears about autonomous vehicles
Townsend, R. M., Atkinson‐Palombo, C., Terbeck, F. J., et al. (2021) · Case Studies on Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2021.11.001 · Cited by 7
Self-citationGlobal contexts, local intentions: modeling MaaS acceptance across 10 cities
Orozco-Fontalvo, M., Oviedo-Trespalacios, Ó., Useche, S. A., et al. (2026) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2026.104951 · Cited by 2
Entangled Future Im/mobilities
Atanasova, D., Bund, R., Buschmann, D., Diniega, R., Donat, J., Gföllner, B., & Kopf, N. (2024) · Vernetzen - bewegen - verorten · doi:10.1515/9783839473801 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, A. V., Atkinson-Palombo, C., & Garrick, N. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- University of Connecticut carol.atkinson-palombo@uconn.edu
- ORCID
- Garrick, Norman W.
- Venue
- Transfers
- Publisher
- Berghahn Books
- Published
- 2019-06-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 27-44
- ISSN
- 2045-4813 (ISSN-L)
- 2045-4821
- OpenAlex
- W2999550650
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transfers (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Keywords
- Segway, social acceptance of technology, technology adoption, electric scooters, transportation technology, regulatory challenges, consumer acceptance, autonomous vehicles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Rise and Fall of the Segway. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3167/trans.2019.090203
- The paper
- Clark, A. V., Atkinson-Palombo, C., & Garrick, N. W. (2019). The Rise and Fall of the Segway. Transfers. https://doi.org/10.3167/trans.2019.090203