Necropsy as a means to gain additional information about causes of dairy cow deaths
Open accessAbstract
High mortality among dairy cows constitutes a problem both financially and in relation to animal welfare. Knowledge about causes of death is a fundamental step toward reducing cow mortality. Several studies have evaluated causes of dairy cow deaths. However, the vast majority of studies describing causes of death are based on questionnaires with farmers or veterinarians. It is uncertain to what degree such information is sufficient and reflects the true cause of death or euthanasia. In this study, proximate causes of death were evaluated based on a thorough necropsy of a random sample of 79 Danish dairy cows at an incineration plant. The necropsy was combined with information about the farmer's perception regarding the cause of death and information about disease treatments from the Danish Cattle Database. Pneumonia and locomotor disorders were found to be the most predominant proximate causes of death. Often the death occurred after a prolonged period during which the cow suffered several different disorders, even though this was often not noticed by the farmer. Causes of death stated by the farmers agreed with the necropsy results in 50 to 64% of cases. Information about disease treatments from the Danish Cattle Database agreed with the necropsy results in 34 to 39% of cases. All 3 sources of information about cause of death agreed in only 1 out of 4 cases, and even when the farmer and the disease recordings did agree with the necropsy results, the latter often gave additional information about the cause of death. In many situations, therefore, a necropsy may be a valuable tool when trying to control excessive cow mortality in a herd.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A significant number of adult cattle that underwent necropsy were found to have succumbed to fatal pneumonia.
“A significant number of adult cattle that underwent necropsy were found to have succumbed to fatal pneumonia [138,139,140].”
From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [138]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Jensen, H. E. 2011. Necropsy of ruminants. Pages 33-59 in Necropsy- A Handbook and Atlas. H. E. Jensen, ed. Biofolia, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Thomsen, P. T., and H. Houe. 2006. Dairy cow mortality-A review. Vet. Q. 28:122-129.
- Watson, E. N., G. P. David, and A. J. C. Cook. 2008. Review of diagnostic laboratory submissions of adult cattle 'found dead' in England and Wales in 2004. Vet. Rec. 163:531-535.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview
Kamel, M. S., Davidson, J. L., & Verma, M. S. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14040627 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“A significant number of adult cattle that underwent necropsy were found to have succumbed to fatal pneumonia [138–140].”
Background
- Authors
- Thomsen, P. T., Dahl-Pedersen, K., & Jensen, H. E.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Thomsen, P.T.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5798-5803
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038536222
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
- Keywords
- causes of death, necropsy, pneumonia, locomotor disorders, animal welfare
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Autopsy, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Cause of Death, Female
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review