Cited by 31Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyCrop Yield and Soil FertilityAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Molecular structure, chemical and nutrient profiles, and metabolic characteristics of the proteins and energy in new cool-season corn varieties harvested as fresh forage for dairy cattle

Open access
Abeysekara, Saman, Christensen, David A., Niu, Zhiyuan, Theodoridou, Katerina, Yu, Peiqiang·2013·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

To our knowledge, no previous research exists concerning the molecular structure and metabolic characteristics of the proteins and energy that new cool-season corn varieties provide for dairy cattle. The objectives of this study were to identify the differences in the molecular structures of proteins among several new cool-season corn varieties [Pioneer P7443R, Pioneer P7213R, Pioneer P7535R (Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc., Johnston, IA), Hyland Baxxos RR, Hyland SR22, and Hyland SR06 (Hyland Seeds, Blenheim, ON, Canada)] using Fourier transform infrared attenuated total reflectance (FT/IR-ATR) molecular spectroscopy, and to determine the nutrient profile and supply that each variety provided for dairy cattle. The protein molecular structure studies showed that the amide I to amide II ratio ranged from 1.09 to 1.66 and that the α-helix to β-sheet ratio ranged from 0.95 to 1.01 among the new cool-season corn varieties. Energy content was significantly different among the new varieties. We found significant differences in the protein and carbohydrate subfractions and in the ruminal degradation kinetics of the organic matter, crude protein, starch, and neutral detergent fiber of the new varieties. The new varieties had similar estimated intestinal digestibilities for rumen undegraded crude protein. However, the new varieties had significant differences in predicted total truly absorbable protein, ranging from 39 to 57 g/kg of dry matter, indicating that these newly developed varieties are satisfactory sources of truly absorbed protein for dairy cattle. Further study on the molecular structure profiles of cool-season corn in relation to its nutrient utilization and availability in dairy cattle is necessary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2013-6841

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Abeysekara, A. W. A. S. 2004. The nutritional value of oat forage for dairy cows. MS Thesis Dissertation. University of Saskatchewan. Accessed Jan. 17, 2013. http://ecommons.usask.ca/handle/10388/ etd-10312003-170820.
  2. Arturo, W. 2003. Corn and capitalism: How a botanical bastard grew to global dominance. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel
  3. Coors, J. G., and J. G. Lauer. 2001. Silage corn. Pages 347-392 in Specialty Corns. 2nd ed. A. R. Hallauer, ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  4. Gyori, Z. 2010. Corn: Characteristics and quality requirements. Pages 183-209 in Cereal Grains: Assessing and Managing Quality. C. W. Wrigley, and I. L. Batey, ed. Food Science, Technology and Nutri- tion Series. Woodhead Publ., Oxford, UK.
  5. Huntington, J. A., and D. I. Givens. 1995. The in situ technique for studying the rumen degradation of feeds: A review of the proce- dure. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 65:63-93.
  6. Johnson, L., J. H. Harrison, C. Hunt, K. Shinners, C. G. Doggett, and D. Sapienza. 1999. Nutritive value of corn silage as affected by maturity and mechanical processing: A contemporary review. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2813-2825.
  7. NRC. 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 7th rev. ed. Na- tional Academies Press, Washington, DC.
  8. NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. Na- tional Academies Press, Washington, DC.
  9. Verité, R., and T. Geay. 1987. Evaluation and implementation of the PDI system in France. Pages 249-261 in Feed Evaluation and Pro- tein Requirement Systems for Ruminants. R. Jarrige, and G. Al- derman, ed. ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels, Belgium.
  10. Yu, P., J. O. Goelema, B. J. Leury, S. Tamminga, and A. R. Egan. 2002. An analysis of the nutritive value of heat processed legume seeds for animal production using the DVE/OEB model: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 99:141-176.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abeysekara, S., Christensen, D. A., Niu, Z., Theodoridou, K., & Yu, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • Tianjin Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yu, Peiqiang
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2013-10
Volume
96
Issue
10
Pages
6631-6643
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057464223
Cited by
31
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Agriculture Strategic Research Chair Program
  • Saskatchewan Agricultural Development Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
protein structure, protein digestibility, energy content, starch, neutral detergent fiber, maize varieties
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Cattle, Zea mays, Dietary Proteins, Energy Metabolism, Kinetics, Rumen, Seasons, Starch, Molecular Structure, Protein Structure, Secondary, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review