Cited by 71Animal health and immunologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesSmart Agriculture and AI

The association between daily average feeding behaviors and morbidity in automatically fed group-housed preweaned dairy calves

Open access
Knauer, W.A., Godden, S.M., Dietrich, A., James, R.E.·2017·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Group housing and computerized feeding of preweaned dairy calves is gaining popularity among dairy producers worldwide, yet disease incidence and detection remain a challenge in these systems. The aim of this prospective observational cohort study was to describe the relationship between morbidity and feeding behavior around the period of illness detection. Calves were enrolled upon entrance to the group pen on 10 farms in Minnesota (n = 4) and Virginia (n = 6) utilizing group housing and computerized feeding from February until October 2014. Morbidity and mortality events were recorded by the calf caregiver. Farms were visited either every week (Minnesota) or every other week (Virginia) to collect calf enrollment data, feeding behavior data, and health records. Daily average feeding behaviors (drinking speed, mL/min; daily consumption, L/d; rewarded visits to the feeder; and unrewarded visits to the feeder) were described both overall and for sick and healthy calf days. Multivariable mixed models were built to assess the differences in daily average feeding behaviors (drinking speed, daily consumption, rewarded visits, unrewarded visits) between matched sick and healthy calves around the time of an illness event (-10 to 10 d). Final models were controlled for calf age, region (Minnesota and Virginia), group size, disease diagnosis, the random effect of farm, and repeated measurements on calf. A stratified analysis was performed by both day from treatment event and disease diagnosis. We enrolled 1,052 calves representing 43,607 calf days over 9 mo. From these, 176 sick calves had a matched control and were carried forward to the matched pair analysis. Fifty-five percent of sick calves (97/176) were treated for diarrhea, 30% (53/176) were treated for pneumonia, and 15% (26/176) were treated for ill thrift. Sick calves drank 183 ± 27 mL/min (mean ± standard error) more slowly, drank 1.2 ± 0.6 L/d less, and had 3.1 ± 0.7 fewer unrewarded visits than control calves on the first day of treatment. These differences began up to 4 d before the calf was detected as sick, and persisted for 7 to 10 d after treatment. However, changes in feeding behaviors varied by disease diagnosed. Rewarded visits were not associated with morbidity status. The results of this study indicate that sick calves change their feeding behavior before and during an illness event, suggesting that feeding behavior may be a useful tool to detect disease onset.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2016-12372

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Calves with poor weaning outcomes displayed a decreased drinking rate and shorter suckling times.

    “The collected data from non-nutritive visits revealed that calves with poor weaning outcomes displayed a decreased drinking rate and shorter suckling times [104,230].”

    From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [104]

    The Matched Pair Analysis reports that sick calves drank more slowly than healthy controls, and the Conclusions report fewer unrewarded feeder visits. The study relates these behaviors to illness, not poor weaning outcomes; the passages do not report shorter suckling times. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Automated systems can detect behavioral shifts earlier than human observers, but the risk of false positives remains.

    “While automated systems can detect these behavioral shifts earlier than human observers, the risk of false positives remains [104].”

    From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [104]

    The Feeding Behaviors and Disease section reports changes in automatically recorded feeding behaviors up to four days before producer-identified illness events. But the paper says further studies are needed to determine whether those behaviors can be used to detect disease; it does not show that an automated system detects illness earlier than human observers or evaluate its false-positive rate. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Calves consuming an average of 9.4 L of milk per day experienced a marked decline in drinking speed on the day they were diagnosed with BRD and showed a drop in unrewarded visits to the feeder ten days preceding the diagnosis.

    “Studies assessing changes in drinking behavior around BRD diagnosis revealed that calves consuming an average of 9.4 L of milk per day experienced a marked decline in drinking speed on the day they were diagnosed with BRD and showed a drop in unrewarded visits to the feeder ten days preceding the diagnosis [104].”

    From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [104]

    The Matched Pair Analysis reports that calves treated for respiratory illness drank significantly more slowly than healthy controls on the day illness was detected. But General Farm and Feeder Management Description identifies 9.4 L/day as the average full feeding level offered, not milk consumed; Feeding Behaviors for All Calves reports average consumption of 6.6 L/day. In the Matched Pair Analysis, fewer unrewarded visits at day −10 applied to illnesses combined, while the respiratory group showed a significant difference only on the treatment day. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The primary distinct feeding trait among BRD categories was drinking speed; calves with clinical BRD drank more slowly.

    “The primary distinct feeding trait among the BRD categories was drinking speed; calves with clinical BRD drank more slowly, reflecting findings by Knauer et al. which showed that clinically sick calves were slower drinkers on diagnosis day [104].”
  • The reliability of daily feeding pattern metrics in predicting illness is not yet proven.

    “Although these metrics can track the daily feeding patterns of dairy calves using milk vending machines, their reliability in predicting illness is not yet proven [104].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jorgensen, M. W. 2016. Dairy calf health and welfare in automated feeding systems in the upper Midwest U.S.A. PhD thesis. Depart- ment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St.
  2. Steenkamer, N. 1982. Alternative housing systems for veal calves, their effect on welfare and performance and their economic feasibility. Pages 226-234 in Welfare and Husbandry of Calves: Current Top- ics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science. J. P. Signoret, ed. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knauer, W. A., Godden, S. M., Dietrich, A., & James, R. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Knauer, W.A.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2017-07
Volume
100
Issue
7
Pages
5642-5652
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2611933501
Cited by
71
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Minnesota, College of Veterinary Medicine Population Systems Signature Program
  • Virginia State Dairymen's Association
  • Land O'Lakes Animal Milk Products
  • USDA (2012-38420-30221)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
Keywords
behavior, preweaned dairy calves, group housing, calf morbidity, feed intake, feeder visits, early illness detection, calf diarrhea, calf pneumonia, ill-thrift, automated feeding systems, calf health monitoring, mortality, matched-pair analysis, mixed models, Virginia, herd health management
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Diarrhea, Drinking Behavior, Feeding Behavior, Feeding Methods, Housing, Animal, Minnesota, Pneumonia, Time Factors, Virginia, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review