Effect of re-ensiling on the quality of sorghum silage
Open accessAbstract
The commercialization of silage in many countries, including Brazil, has increased in recent years. Re-ensiling of previously ensiled forage occurs when silage is relocated from one farm to another, where it will be compacted and sealed again. During this process, silage is exposed to oxygen before being ensiled, which may affect its quality. We exposed sorghum silage to air during the anaerobic storage phase to simulate the transportation of silages between farms. Experimental treatments included silage exposed to air for 0 or 12 h, with or without the use of an inoculant containing a mixture of Lactobacillus plantarum and the propionic bacteria Propionibacterium acidipropionici (1 × 10 6 cfu/g of forage; Biomax corn, Lallemand, Saint-Simon, France), totaling 4 treatments: conventional silage, conventional silage with inoculant use, re-ensilage after exposure to air, and re-ensilage after exposure to air with use of an inoculant. The sorghum was stored in experimental silos containing about 9.0 kg of fresh forage per replicate. Treatments were tested in a factorial 2 × 2 design with 5 replicates each. Chemical composition, in vitro dry matter digestibility, fermentative characteristics, losses (due to gas, effluents, and total dry matter), microorganism counts, and aerobic stability of sorghum silage were evaluated. Dry matter content of sorghum before ensiling was 273.12 g/kg. The 12-h re-ensiling process increased the effluent loss of the silage when compared with conventional silage (456.42 vs. 201.19 g/kg of FM, respectively). In addition, re-ensiled silages presented lower concentrations of lactic acid and higher concentrations of propionic acid than the silages that had not been opened during storage. The aerobic stability of silage was not affected by the re-ensiling process and the use of inoculant. The use of inoculant increased the pH and loss of dry matter of the silages (4.23 vs. 3.98 and 14.05 vs. 7.82%, respectively) and therefore did not provide any benefits in this study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Air exposure during ensiling can delay fermentation by allowing undesired aerobic microbes to metabolize forage components, which slows growth of lactic acid bacteria, increases pH, and fosters growth of undesirable organisms such as yeasts and molds.
“Air exposure during the ensiling process can delay fermentation by allowing undesired aerobic microbes to metabolize forage components, which slows down the growth of lactic acid bacteria, increases pH levels, and fosters the growth of undesirable organisms such as yeasts and molds.”
From Influence of Ensiling Timing and Inoculation on Whole Plant Maize Silage Fermentation and Aerobic Stability (Preliminary Research) (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
Prolonged aerobic exposure may lead to greater contamination by yeasts.
“Additionally, prolonged aerobic exposure may lead to greater contamination by yeasts [6].”
From Influence of Ensiling Timing and Inoculation on Whole Plant Maize Silage Fermentation and Aerobic Stability (Preliminary Research) (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- dos Anjos, G. V. S., Gonçalves, L. C., Rodrigues, J. A. S., Keller, K. M., Coelho, M. M., Michel, P. H. F., Ottoni, D., & Jayme, D. G.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
- Embrapa (BR)
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 6047-6054
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2794539685
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
- Keywords
- sorghum silage, silage quality, silage inoculants, Lactobacillus plantarum, Propionibacterium acidipropionici, aerobic stability, silage effluent losses, dry matter loss, lactic acid, propionic acid, silage pH
- MeSH terms
- Aerobiosis, Animals, Animal Feed, Zea mays, Fermentation, Food Preservation, Silage, Sorghum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review