Cited by 31Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyAgricultural Engineering and Mechanization

Effect of re-ensiling on the quality of sorghum silage

Open access
dos Anjos, G.V.S., Gonçalves, L.C., Rodrigues, J.A.S., Keller, K.M., Coelho, M.M., Michel, P.H.F., Ottoni, D., Jayme, D.G.·2018·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

The commercialization of silage in many countries, including Brazil, has increased in recent years. Re-ensiling of previously ensiled forage occurs when silage is relocated from one farm to another, where it will be compacted and sealed again. During this process, silage is exposed to oxygen before being ensiled, which may affect its quality. We exposed sorghum silage to air during the anaerobic storage phase to simulate the transportation of silages between farms. Experimental treatments included silage exposed to air for 0 or 12 h, with or without the use of an inoculant containing a mixture of Lactobacillus plantarum and the propionic bacteria Propionibacterium acidipropionici (1 × 10 6 cfu/g of forage; Biomax corn, Lallemand, Saint-Simon, France), totaling 4 treatments: conventional silage, conventional silage with inoculant use, re-ensilage after exposure to air, and re-ensilage after exposure to air with use of an inoculant. The sorghum was stored in experimental silos containing about 9.0 kg of fresh forage per replicate. Treatments were tested in a factorial 2 × 2 design with 5 replicates each. Chemical composition, in vitro dry matter digestibility, fermentative characteristics, losses (due to gas, effluents, and total dry matter), microorganism counts, and aerobic stability of sorghum silage were evaluated. Dry matter content of sorghum before ensiling was 273.12 g/kg. The 12-h re-ensiling process increased the effluent loss of the silage when compared with conventional silage (456.42 vs. 201.19 g/kg of FM, respectively). In addition, re-ensiled silages presented lower concentrations of lactic acid and higher concentrations of propionic acid than the silages that had not been opened during storage. The aerobic stability of silage was not affected by the re-ensiling process and the use of inoculant. The use of inoculant increased the pH and loss of dry matter of the silages (4.23 vs. 3.98 and 14.05 vs. 7.82%, respectively) and therefore did not provide any benefits in this study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2017-13687

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 31

Authors
dos Anjos, G. V. S., Gonçalves, L. C., Rodrigues, J. A. S., Keller, K. M., Coelho, M. M., Michel, P. H. F., Ottoni, D., & Jayme, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • Embrapa (BR)
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2018-07
Volume
101
Issue
7
Pages
6047-6054
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794539685
Cited by
31
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
Keywords
sorghum silage, silage quality, silage inoculants, Lactobacillus plantarum, Propionibacterium acidipropionici, aerobic stability, silage effluent losses, dry matter loss, lactic acid, propionic acid, silage pH
MeSH terms
Aerobiosis, Animals, Animal Feed, Zea mays, Fermentation, Food Preservation, Silage, Sorghum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review