Cited by 92Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal health and immunologyVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Measurement of dairy calf behavior prior to onset of clinical disease and in response to disbudding using automated calf feeders and accelerometers

Open access
Sutherland, M.A., Lowe, G.L., Huddart, F.J., Waas, J.R., Stewart, M.·2018·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

We determined if feeding and lying behavior, recorded by automatic calf feeding systems (ACFS) and accelerometers, could be used to detect changes in behavior before onset of neonatal calf diarrhea (NCD) or in response to disbudding pain in dairy calves. At 4 d of age, 112 calves had accelerometers attached to their hind leg and were housed in pens with ACFS. Calves were examined daily for signs of illness or injury. Of the 112 calves monitored, 18 were diagnosed with NCD; activities of calves with NCD were then compared with those of 18 healthy controls (calves that had no symptoms of NCD, other illnesses, or injury). Feeding (milk consumption and the number of rewarded and unrewarded visits to the feeder) and lying behavior during the 5 d leading up to calves displaying clinical signs of NCD were analyzed. Calves with NCD performed fewer unrewarded visits and consumed less milk than healthy calves during the 2- and 4-d periods before diagnosis with NCD, respectively. Calves with NCD tended to perform fewer lying bouts than healthy calves over the 5-d period before diagnosis with NCD. At 3 wk of age, a subset of 51 healthy calves were allocated to 1 of 5 treatment groups: (1) sham handling (SHAM, n = 10), (2) cautery disbudding (DB, n = 11), (3) administration of local anesthetic (LA) and DB (LA+DB, n = 11), 4) administration of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and DB (NSAID+DB, n = 9), and (5) administration of LA, NSAID and DB (LA+NSAID+DB, n = 10). Feeding and lying behavior were recorded continuously for 24 h pre- and postdisbudding. We found no effect of treatment on the number of rewarded or unrewarded visits to the feeder and milk volume consumed 24 h before administration of treatments. During the 24-h postdisbudding period, SHAM calves performed more unrewarded visits than DB, LA+DB, and NSAID+DB calves, but the number of unrewarded visits did not differ between SHAM and LA+NSAID+DB calves. During the first hour of the posttreatment period we noted a difference in lying times among treatments, with DB and NSAID+DB calves spending less time lying than SHAM calves and lying times being similar between SHAM, LA+DB, and LA+NSAID+DB calves. The ACFS and accelerometers have the potential to automatically gather valuable information regarding health status and pain in calves. Therefore, it may be advantageous to combine both of these measures (ACFS and accelerometers) when evaluating NCD on farm or pain in calves in future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2017-14207

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A similar decrease in unrewarded visits occurred two days before BRD diagnosis in calves consuming 6 L or 8 L of milk/day.

    “A similar decrease in unrewarded visits occurred two days before BRD diagnosis in calves consuming 6 L or 8 L of milk/day [236].”

    From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [236]

    The Results (Automated Assessment of Calf Health; page unavailable) report fewer unrewarded visits two days before diagnosis, and the Discussion says those calves received 6 L of milk per day. The diagnosis was neonatal calf diarrhea (NCD), not BRD, and the paper does not report this finding for calves receiving 8 L per day. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bates A.J. Eder P. Laven R. Effect of analgesia and anti-inflammatory treatment on weight gain and milk intake of dairy calves after disbudding N. Z. Vet. J. 63 2015 153 157 25371291 25371291
  2. Bonk S. Burfeind O. Suthar V.S. Heuwieser W. Technical note: Evaluation of data loggers for measuring lying behavior in dairy calves J. Dairy Sci. 96 2013 3265 3271 10.3168/jds.2012-6003 23498014 23498014 · DOI
  3. Borderas T.F. de Pasille A.M. Rushen J. Behaviour of dairy calves after a low dose of bacterial endotoxin J. Anim. Sci. 86 2008 2920 2927 18641175 18641175
  4. Borderas T.F. Rushen J. von Keyserlingk M.A.G. de Pasille A.M. Automated measurement of changes in feeding behaviour of milk fed calves associated with illness J. Dairy Sci. 92 2009 4549 4554 19700717 19700717
  5. Duffield T.F. Heinrich A. Millman S.T. DeHaan A. James S. Lissemore K. Reduction in pain response by combined use of local anesthesia and systemic ketoprofen in dairy calves dehorned by heat cauterization Can. Vet. J. 51 2010 283 288 20514252 20514252 PMC2822372
  6. Faulkner P.M. Weary D.M. Reducing pain after dehorning in calves J. Dairy Sci. 83 2000 2037 2041 11003236 11003236
  7. Hart B.L. Biological basis of the behavior of sick animals Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 12 1988 123 137 3050629 3050629
  8. Heinrich A. Duffield T.F. Lissemore K.D. Millman S.T. The effect of meloxicam on behavior and pain sensitivity of dairy calves following cautery dehorning with a local anesthetic J. Dairy Sci. 93 2010 2450 2457 10.3168/jds.2009-2813 20494153 20494153 · DOI
  9. Jasper J. Weary D.M. Effects of ad libitum milk intake on dairy calves J. Dairy Sci. 85 2002 3054 3058 12487471 12487471
  10. Lowe G. Schaefer A.L. Waas J.R. Wilson M.T. Sutherland M.A. Stewart M. Brief communicatION: The use of infrared thermography and feeding behaviour for early disease detection in New Zealand dairy calves Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 76 2016 177 179
  11. McMeekan C.M. Stafford K.J. Mellor D.J. Bruce R.A. Ward R.N. Gregory N. Effects of regional analgesia and/or a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic on the acute cortisol response to dehorning in calves Res. Vet. Sci. 64 1998 147 150 9625471 9625471
  12. McMeekan C. Stafford K.J. Mellor D.J. Bruce R.A. Ward R.N. Gregory N.G. Effects of a local anaesthetic and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic on the behavioural responses of calves to dehorning N. Z. Vet. J. 47 1999 92 96 16032080 16032080
  13. Neave H.W. Doras R.R. Costas J.H.C. von Keyserlingk M.A.G. Weary D.M. Pain and pessimism: Dairy calves exhibit negative judgement bias following hot-iron disbudding PLoS One 8 2013 e80556 10.1371/journal.pone.0080556 24324609 24324609 PMC3851165 · DOI
  14. Schroeder M.E. Bounpheng M.A. Rodgers S. Baker R.J. Black W. Naikare H. Velayudhan B. Sneed L. Szonyi B. Clavijo A. Development and performance evaluation of calf diarrhoea pathogen nucleic acid purification and detection workflow J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 24 2012 945 953 22914823 22914823
  15. Sutherland M.A. Ballou M.A. Davis B.L. Brooks T.A. Effect of castration and dehorning singularly or combined on the behavior and physiology of Holstein calves J. Anim. Sci. 91 2013 935 942 10.2527/jas.2012-5190 23287529 23287529 · DOI
  16. Svensson C. Jensen M.B. Identification of diseased calves by use of data from automatic milk feeders J. Dairy Sci. 90 2007 994 997 17235177 17235177
  17. Swartz T.H. Findlay A.N. Petersson-Wolfe C.S. Short communication: Automated detection of behavioral changes from respiratory disease in pre-weaned calves J. Dairy Sci. 100 2017 9273 9278 28918146 28918146

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sutherland, M. A., Lowe, G. L., Huddart, F. J., Waas, J. R., & Stewart, M.
Affiliations
  • AgResearch (NZ)
  • University of Waikato (NZ)
Corresponding author
Sutherland, M.A.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2018-09
Volume
101
Issue
9
Pages
8208-8216
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808678508
Cited by
92
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
AgResearch
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
neonatal calf diarrhea, dairy calves, accelerometer, feeding behavior, lying behavior, milk consumption, early detection of disease, pain management, local anesthetics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cattle welfare, behavioral monitoring, NSAID analgesia
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, Local, Anesthetics, Local, Animals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Behavior, Animal, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Diarrhea, Milk, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review