The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low Somatic Cell Count: a Risk Factor for Subsequent Clinical Mastitis in a Dairy Herd
Open accessAbstract
A case-control study was conducted to evaluate factors measured at the udder inflammation-free state as risk factors for subsequent clinical mastitis. The factors including somatic cell count (SCC), body condition score, milk yield, percentages of milk fat and milk protein, and diseases were evaluated for their association with the results of udder inflammatory response. The results of the response were specified as presence (case) and absence (control) of clinical signs of mastitis. Data on Holstein Friesian cows calving from January 1984 to November 1996 from a commercial farm with low bulk milk SCC were used. Univariable and multivariable random-effect logistic models were used to evaluate the effect of those factors on the risk of clinical mastitis. The following variables were associated with increased odds of case versus control events in the univariable analysis: early lactation period, low SCC, high milk yield, high percentage of milk protein, high percentage of milk fat, low body condition score, retained placenta, and milk fever. For the final multivariable model of all variables used for analysis, only low SCC remained significantly associated with increased risk of subsequent clinical mastitis. The authors concluded that very low SCC during the udder inflammation-free state are associated with increased risk of clinical mastitis.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The percentage distribution of Gram-negative bacteria causing clinical mastitis is herd dependant, but studies in the United States and Europe consistently report that appropriately 40% of clinical cases are the result of Gram-negative bacteria [25, 27, 55, 57].”
From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [57]
In the citing paper
“The high frequency of clinical cases and relatively short duration of Gram-negative bacterial intramammary infections render the use of individual cow SCC and bulk tank SCC as poor indicators of the prevalence of disease caused by these bacteria [13, 20, 25, 57].”
From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [57]
In the citing paper
“Rate of clinical cases caused by Gram-negative bacteria average approximately 20 cases per 100 cows per year in these studies.”
From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
A Body Condition Scoring Chart for Holstein Dairy Cows
Edmonson, A. J., Lean, I. J., Weaver, L. D., Farver, T. B., & Webster, G. (1989) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(89)79081-0 · Cited by 2,959
An Optimum Transformation for Somatic Cell Concentration in Milk
Ali, A. K. A., & Shook, G. E. (1980) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(80)82959-6 · Cited by 717
Barkema, H. W., Schukken, Y. H., Lam, T. J. G. M., Beiboer, M. L., Wilmink, H., Benedictus, G., & Brand, A. (1998) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75591-2 · Cited by 505
Self-citationHeuer, C., Schukken, Y. H., & Dobbelaar, P. (1999) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75236-7 · Cited by 459
Self-citationHu, F. B., Goldberg, J., Hedeker, D., Flay, B. R., & Pentz, M. A. (1998) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009511 · Cited by 422
Schepers, A. J., Lam, T. J. G. M., Schukken, Y. H., Wilmink, J. B. M., & Hanekamp, W. J. A. (1997) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(97)76118-6 · Cited by 410
Self-citationCurtis, C. R., Erb, H. N., Sniffen, C. J., Smith, R. D., & Kronfeld, D. S. (1985) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(85)81109-7 · Cited by 408
Control of Mastitis in the Dairy Herd by Hygiene and Management
Neave, F. K., Dodd, F. H., Kingwill, R. G., & Westgarth, D. R. (1969) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(69)86632-4 · Cited by 361
Evaluation of changes in somatic cell counts as indicators of new intramammary infections
Dohoo, I. R., & Leslie, K. E. (1991) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/0167-5877(91)90006-n · Cited by 336
Factors Affecting Milk Somatic Cells and Their Role in Health of the Bovine Mammary Gland
Kehrli, M. E., & Shuster, D. E. (1994) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(94)76992-7 · Cited by 286
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- van Werven, T. 1999. The role of leukocytes in bovine Escherichia coli mastitis. Ph.D. thesis. University Utrecht.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bovine Mastitis: An Evolving Disease
Bradley, A. (2002) · The Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1053/tvjl.2002.0724 · Cited by 1,004
Monitoring udder health and milk quality using somatic cell counts
Schukken, Y. H., Wilson, D. J., Welcome, F. L., Garrison-Tikofsky, L., & González, R. N. (2003) · Veterinary Research · doi:10.1051/vetres:2003028 · Cited by 766
Self-citationSeverity of E. coli mastitis is mainly determined by cow factors
Burvenich, C., Merris, V. V., Mehrzad, J., Diez‐Fraile, A., & Duchateau, L. (2003) · Veterinary Research · doi:10.1051/vetres:2003023 · Cited by 620
Ingvartsen, K. L., Dewhurst, R. J., & Friggens, N. C. (2003) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(03)00110-6 · Cited by 500
Defense of the Bovine Mammary Gland by Polymorphonuclear Neutrophil Leukocytes
Paape, M. J., Mehrzad, J., Zhao, X., Detilleux, J. C., & Burvenich, C. (2002) · Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia · doi:10.1023/a:1020343717817 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Suriyasathaporn, W., Schukken, Y. H., Nielen, M., & Brand, A.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Khon Kaen University (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Suriyasathaporn, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1248-1255
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111241613
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 24.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal health and immunology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Keywords
- clinical mastitis, somatic cell count, risk factors, Holstein cows, udder inflammation, bulk tank milk, body condition score, milk yield, milk fat, milk protein, retained placenta, milk fever, early lactation, dairy herds
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cattle, Cell Count, Female, Mammary Glands, Animal, Mastitis, Bovine, Milk, Risk Factors, Incidence, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
