Cited by 234Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyCrop Yield and Soil FertilityAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Effects of Brown Midrib 3 Mutation in Corn Silage on Productivity of Dairy Cows Fed Two Concentrations of Dietary Neutral Detergent Fiber: 1. Feeding Behavior and Nutrient Utilization

Open access
Oba, M., Allen, M.S.·2000·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

The effects of digestibility of corn silage neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and dietary NDF content on feeding behavior, dry matter intake (DMI), and energy utilization were evaluated with eight multiparous high producing dairy cows in a duplicated 4 x 4 Latin square design with 21-d periods. Experimental diets contained corn silage from a brown midrib (bm3) hybrid or its isogenic normal control at two concentrations of dietary NDF (29 and 38%). Both low NDF diets and bm3 corn silage treatments increased DMI and milk yield. However, an interaction between corn silage treatment and dietary NDF content was observed for meal size and for interval between meals, implying that different mechanisms regulating DMI dominate depending on the fermentation characteristics of diets. The bm3 treatment depressed milk fat concentration when fed in a low NDF diet. The bm3 corn silage increased solids-corrected milk yield, but did not affect daily body weight gain compared with control, whereas low NDF diets increased daily body weight gain, but did not affect solids-corrected milk yield compared to high NDF diets. Both bm3 treatments and low NDF diets reduced ruminal pH, but low NDF treatments increased fluctuation of ruminal pH and bm3 treatments did not. Feeding bm3 corn silage increased the energy utilized for milk production, possibly because of a consistent supply of metabolic fuels from the rumen. The beneficial effects of bm3 corn silage on productivity of lactating cows were greater for the cows fed a high NDF diet.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)75000-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 234

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]2. Allen, M., and M. Oba. 1996. Fiber digestibility of forages. Pages 151-171 in Proc. 57th Minnesota Nutr. Conf. Protiva Tech. Symp. Ext. Special Programs, Bloomington, MN. Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.
  2. [14]14. JMP User's Guide: Software for Statistical Visualization on the Apple Macintosh. Version 2.05 Edition. 1989. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.
  3. [21]21. Moe, P. W., and H. F. Tyrrell. 1976. Estimating metabolizable and net energy of feeds. Pages. 232-236 in Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on Feed Composition, Animal Nutrient Requirements, and Com- puterization of Diets. P. V. Fonnesbeck, L. E. Harris, and L. C. Kearl, ed. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta., Utah State University, Logan, Utah.

Authors
Oba, M., & Allen, M. S.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2000-06
Volume
83
Issue
6
Pages
1333-1341
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027716094
Cited by
234
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
24.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Michigan State University
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
corn silage, neutral detergent fiber, dairy cattle, feeding behavior, dry matter intake, milk yield, milk fat content, weight gain, rumen pH, energy utilization, forage digestibility, meal size
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Zea mays, Dietary Fiber, Digestion, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Female, Fermentation, Lactation, Milk, Mutation, Random Allocation, Rumen, Silage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review