The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Hoof Pathologies on Subjective Assessments of Dairy Cow Gait
Open accessAbstract
To explore how hoof pathologies affect dairy cattle gait, we studied cows with sole hemorrhages (n = 14), sole ulcers (n = 7), and those with no visible injuries (n = 17). Overall gait assessments, scored from video using a 1 to 5 numerical rating system (1 = sound, 5 = severely lame) and a continuous 100-unit visual analog scale, found cows having sole ulcers had poorer gait than healthy cows (mean +/- SEM: 4.0 +/- 0.13 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.08, and 59 +/- 3 vs. 46 +/- 2, respectively). Six gait attributes (back arch, head bob, tracking-up, joint flexion, asymmetric gait, and reluctance to bear weight) were also assessed using continuous 100-unit scales. Compared with healthy cows, those having sole ulcers walked with a more pronounced back arch (12 +/- 3 vs. 28 +/- 4), more jerky head movement (2 +/- 2 vs. 10 +/- 3), shortened strides (7 +/- 2 vs. 26 +/- 4), and more uneven weighting among the limbs (16 +/- 2 vs. 32 +/- 3). Of all measures, the numerical rating system most effectively discriminated healthy cows from those with sole ulcers (R2 = 0.73), classifying 92% of animals correctly. No differences were detected among cows with and without sole hemorrhages. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were reasonable for all measures (R2 > or = 0.64) except joint flexion and asymmetric gait. In summary, subjective assessments of dairy cattle gait provide valid and reliable approaches to identifying cattle with sole ulcers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Identifying and preventing pain in animals
Weary, D. M., Niel, L., Flower, F. C., & Fraser, D. (2006) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.013 · Cited by 329
Self-citationEffects of Pasture on Lameness in Dairy Cows
Hernandez-Mendo, O., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Veira, D. M., & Weary, D. M. (2007) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(07)71608-9 · Cited by 288
Self-citationLying behavior as an indicator of lameness in dairy cows
Ito, K., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., LeBlanc, S. J., & Weary, D. M. (2010) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2951 · Cited by 270
Self-citationMarchesini, G., Mottaran, D., Contiero, B., Schiavon, E., Segato, S., Garbin, E., Tenti, S., & Andrighetto, I. (2018) · The Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.11.013 · Cited by 64
Racciatti, D. S., Feld, A., Rial, L. A., Blanco, C., & Tallo-Parra, O. (2022) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2022.1033821 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Flower, F. C., & Weary, D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-146
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079070751
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Hoof Pathologies on Subjective Assessments of Dairy Cow Gait. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72077-x
- The paper
- Flower, F. C., & Weary, D. M. (2006). Effect of Hoof Pathologies on Subjective Assessments of Dairy Cow Gait. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72077-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.