Formation of dimethyl sulfide by Propionibacterium shermanii ATCC 9617
Open accessAbstract
As an extension of earlier observations on the ability of Propionibacterium shermanii ATCC 9617 to produce dimethyl sulfide, the quantitative production of this compound was investigated to determine the precursor(s) for dimethyl sulfide formation.Dimethyl sulfide was produced in milk culture at both 8 and 30 C. At 30 C maximum production was attained in 24 hours, further incubation decreased dimethyl sulfide, apparently due to metabolism by the organism.Although the test organism grew readily in sodium lactate broth, it did not produce dimethyl sulfide.Pyruvate as well as cell-free extracts of Streptococcus cremoris and Leuconostoc citro~orum stimulated growth but not allmethyl sulfide formation.Addition of methionine, cysteine, cystathionine or fldimethylpropiothetin chloride to the fermentation failed to enhance dimethyl sulfide accumulation.Upon rennet coagulation, the precursor fraction for dimethyl sulfide formation by the test organism was recovered mostly but not exclusively, in the whey fraction.After exhaustive dialysis of whey, the dlalysate and nondialyzable fractions supported allmethyl sulfide production.When the dialysate was fractionated by gel filtration, the ability of fractions to support dimethyl sulfide production paralleled the protein elution profile.Addition of precipitated whey protein or a-lactalbumin to milk cultures enhanced dimethyl sulfide production.We conclude that P. shermanii ATCC 9617 produces dimethyl sulfide from sulfurcontaining amino acids in peptide linkage.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
P. freudenreichii subsp. shermanii ATCC 9617 produced ~500 μg.L-1 dimethylsulfide (DMS) in milk cultures but not in YEL medium.
“P. freudenreichii subsp.shermanii ATCC 9617 produced ~500 µg .L -1 dimethylsulfide (DMS) in milk cultures but not in YEL medium.”
From Production of cheese flavour compounds derived from amino acid catabolism by <i>Propionibacterium freudenreichii</i> (2002) · cites this paper as [19]
The Results and Discussion report that P. shermanii ATCC 9617 reached approximately 0.5 ppm DMS in milk culture at 30°C, consistent with roughly 500 µg/L. They also report no DMS in broth cultures, but Experimental Procedures identify the broth as sodium lactate broth, not YEL medium. The YEL-specific part of the claim is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDMS probably came from sulphur-containing amino acids in peptide linkage, but not directly from free sulphur-containing amino acids.
“DMS probably came from sulphur-containing amino acids in peptide linkage, but not directly from sulphur-containing amino acids, since the addition of L-Met, D-Met, L-Cys or D-Cys did not enhance the production of DMS in milk culture and did not induce it in YEL culture [19].”
From Production of cheese flavour compounds derived from amino acid catabolism by <i>Propionibacterium freudenreichii</i> (2002) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bassette, R., and O. H. Whitnah. 1960. Re- ~OURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE VOL. 54, 1%I0. 9. moval and identification of organic com- pounds by chemical reaction, in chroma- tographic analysis. Anal. Chem., 32: ]098.
- Gordon, W. G., and E. O. Whittier. 1965. Proteins of milk. In Fundamentals of Dairy Chemistry. B. tI. Webb and A. H. Johnson, ed. Avi. Westport, Connecticut, pp. 54.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thierry, A., & Maillard, M.-B. (2002) · Le Lait · doi:10.1051/lait:2001002 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dykstra, G. J., Drerup, D. L., Branen, A. L., & Keenan, T. W.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- ORCID
- Keenan, T.W.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1971-02
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168-172
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169588697
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Purdue University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
- Keywords
- dimethyl sulfide, Propionibacterium shermanii, cheese ripening, whey protein, sulfur-containing amino acids, methionine, cysteine, cystathionine, alpha-lactalbumin, Streptococcus cremoris, Leuconostoc citreum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review