Cited by 10Enzyme Production and CharacterizationProteins in Food SystemsAdvanced Scientific Research Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Assessment of Purified Bacterial Milk Clotting Enzyme from Bacillus subtilis K-26 for Cheddar Cheese Making

Open access
Krishna Rao, L., Mathur, D.K.·1979·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Effects on Cheddar cheese ripening and quality were compared for five milk clotting enzymes including crude and purified enzymes from Bacillus subtilis K-26, calf rennet, and 50-50 mixtures of the purified bacterial enzymes and calf rennet or swine pepsin.During cheese manufacture, acid development was relatively faster, protein and fat losses were higher, and cheese yields were lower when crude bacterial enzymes were used.Yields of cheese were comparable with purified enzyme in 50:50 combination with calf rennet.The initial soluble nitrogen contents and the maturity indices of bacterial enzyme cheese were higher than for the control cheese.Also the a s-and H-casein fractions were degraded more in bacteria1 enzyme cheese.Organoleptic evaluations indicated that cheese made with a 50:50 combination of purified bacterial enzyme and calf rennet was as acceptable as control cheese with calf rennet.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(79)83255-5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of the rennet from Bacillus subtilis K-26 in Cheddar cheese causes faster acid development, lower protein and fat contents, and greater soluble nitrogen contents in cheese during ripening.

    “The use of the rennet from Bacillus subtilis K‐26 in Cheddar cheese was shown to cause faster acid development, lower protein and fat contents, and greater soluble nitrogen contents in cheese during ripening (Krishna Rao & Mathur, 1979).”

    From Change of proteolysis and sensory profile during ripening of Cheddar-style cheese as influenced by a microbial rennet from rice wine (2019) · cites this paper as Krishna Rao & Mathur, 1979

    “Changes During Manufacture” (page not provided) reports faster acid development with bacterial coagulants and greater protein and fat losses into whey for some enzyme preparations, but not all; it does not establish lower protein and fat contents in the cheese. “Changes During Ripening” reports that soluble nitrogen was higher than in calf-rennet control cheese throughout curing. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Aarnes, 1971, St. Paulin and Jarlesberg cheeses made with Rennilase, Meieriposten, 60, 910
  2. Behnke, 1967, Studies on the action of rennets of different origin. I. Milk coagulation and casein degradation, Milchwissenschaft, 22, 563
  3. Brisk, 1971, Preparation of microbial rennet substitutes by the Koji wheat bran method and their renneting activities at increased temperatures, Schweis Milchztg., 97, 544
  4. Edelsten, 1969, A study of microbial milk coagulating enzymes (microbial rennets), Dairy Sci. Abstr., 31, 652
  5. Emmons, 1971, Cheddar cheese manufacture with pepsin and rennet, Can. Inst. Food Technol., 4, 31, 10.1016/S0008-3860(71)74152-X · DOI
  6. Ganguli, 1967, A simple petri dish device for resolving milk proteins by starch gel electrophoresis, Indian J. Biochem., 4, 232
  7. Green, 1977, Review of the progress of dairy science: milk coagulants, J. Dairy Res., 44, 159, 10.1017/S0022029900020082 · DOI
  8. Maubois, 1969, Proteolytic action of a coagulating enzyme compared with that of rennet, Le Lait, 49, 497, 10.1051/lait:196948819 · DOI
  9. Maragoudakis, 1961, Use of rennets and a rennet like substitute in Cheddar cheese manufacture, J. Dairy Sci., 44, 2339
  10. Martens, 1973, Different types of rennets, Int. Dairy Fed., 74, 1
  11. Melachouris, 1968, Properties of a milk clotting microbial enzyme, J. Dairy Sci., 51, 650, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(68)87049-3 · DOI
  12. Mickelsen, 1970, Comparing proteolytic action of milk clotting enzymes on caseins and cheese, J. Dairy Sci., 53, 704, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(70)86278-6 · DOI
  13. Nelson, 1969, Commercial scale cheese making trials with a milk clotting enzyme produced by Mucor pusillus Lindt, J. Dairy Sci., 52, 889
  14. Puhan, 1973, Proteolysis by proteases of Bacillus subtilis used to make Canadian Cheddar cheese, J. Dairy Sci., 56, 317, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(73)85172-0 · DOI
  15. Ramet, 1973, Etude d’une protease coagulante products part Mucor miebei. III. Utilization de la Rennilase dans lefabrication de fromage a pate pressee non cuite et de from age a pate press cuite, Le Lait, 53, 154, 10.1051/lait:1973523-5248 · DOI
  16. Rao, 1975, Studies on the production of bacterial rennet in a pilot plant fermentor, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 17, 1349, 10.1002/bit.260170909 · DOI
  17. Rao, L. K., and D. K. Mathur. 1978. Purification and characterization of bacterial milk clotting enzyme from Bacillus subtilis K-26. (Submitted for publication) · DOI
  18. Richardson, 1967, Rennin like enzyme from Mucor pusillus for cheese manufacture, J. Dairy Sci., 50, 1066, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(67)87566-0 · DOI
  19. Robertson, 1969, Commercial cheese making with a Japanese microbial rennet, New Zealand J. Dairy Sci. Technol., 4, 128
  20. Sardinas, 1972, Microbial rennets, Adv. Appl. Microbiol., 15, 39, 10.1016/S0065-2164(08)70089-3 · DOI
  21. Singh, 1967, Proteolytic and microbial changes during ripening of Cheddar cheese using bacterial enzymes as milk coagulating agent, J. Dairy Sci., 50, 1886, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(67)87743-9 · DOI
  22. Thomasow, 1970, Experimental cheese making with rennet obtained from Endothia parasitica, Milchwissenschaft, 25, 211
  23. Tsugo, 1964, Studies on cheese making using milk clotting enzyme of Mucor pusillus Lindt. I. Rennet properties of the enzyme, Jap. J. Zootech. Sci., 35, 229
  24. Weckx, 1973, Protein breakdown during the ripening of Herve Cheese investigated by polyaerylamide gel electrophoresis, Milchwissenschaft, 28, 332

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Krishna Rao, L., & Mathur, D. K.
Affiliations
National Dairy Research Institute (IN)
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
1979-03
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
378-383
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975499024
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Advanced Scientific Research Methods
Keywords
Bacillus subtilis, Cheddar cheese, cheese ripening, calf rennet, enzyme mixtures, cheese yield, casein degradation, cheese maturity, cheese quality, organoleptic acceptability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review