Cited by 37Probiotics and Fermented FoodsEnzyme Production and CharacterizationProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides

Peptide Hydrolases of Lactobacillus helveticus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus

Open access
Khalid, Noraini M., El Soda, Morsi, Marth, Elmer H.·1991·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Lactobacillus helveticus C M U 32 had more aminopeptidase and dipeptidase activity than did Lactobacillus helveticus ATCC 10797 or Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp.bulgaricus ATCC 12278, whereas L. helveticus ATCC 10797 was most proteolytic (loo%), followed closely by L. helveticus CNRZ 32 (92%), and L. delbrueckii ssp.bulgaricus ATCC 12278 (50%).Crude cell-free extracts of the three lactobacilli lacked carboxypeptidase and endopeptidase activities.Lactobacillus helveficus (JNRZ 32 had two aminopeptidase-active bands, whereas L. helveticus ATCC 10797 and L. delbrueckii ssp.bulgaricus ATCC 12278 each had only one active aminopeptidase ban& relative mobility values of bands differed among strains.The three lactobacilli each had two active dipeptidase bands with different relative mobilities.Intracellular protease, aminopeptidase, and dipeptidase activities of L. helveticus CNRZ 32 i n m e d gradually at the beginning of the log phase and reached a maximum at the beginning of the stationary phase, but after 24 h, enzyme activity was slightly reduced.Freezing cells at -96'C and holding them at that temperature for 1 wk reduced aminopeptidase and dipeptidase activities 10% compared with those of unfrozen cells.The fbezing process also reduced the population of viable cells grown in MRS broth or skim milk by 50 or 75%, respectively.Aminopeptidase activity of cells grown in sterile skim milk or a whey-based medium did ~~

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78140-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During milk fermentation only 1-2% of milk proteins undergo proteolysis and the principal substrate is casein, but limited degradation of whey proteins may also occur.

    “During milk fermentation only 1–2% of milk proteins undergo proteolysis and the principal substrate is casein but limited degradation of whey proteins may also occur (Khalid et al., 1991; Szwajkowska et al., 2011).”

    From Lactobacillus helveticus: the proteolytic system (2013) · cites this paper as Khalid et al., 1991

    The ‘Growth and Proteolysis by Whole Cells’ section reports degradation of caseins by lactobacilli in skim milk, supporting the casein portion of the claim. Our copy does not state that only 1–2% of milk proteins undergo proteolysis or report limited degradation of whey proteins; the whey-related search returned only a mention of α-lactalbumin as a gel marker. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 6Basch, J. J.. F. W. Douglas, Jr., L. G. Procino, V. H. Holsinger, and H. M Farrell, Jr. 1985. Quantitation of J o d of Dairy Sciem% Vol. 74, No. 1. 1991 casein and whey proteins of processed milks and whey protein concentrates. Application of gel electrophoresis and comparison with Harlaod-Ashwd procadme. J. Dairy Sci. 68:23.
  2. Castberg, H. B.. and H. A. Morris. 1976. Depdation of milk proteins by enzymes from lactic acid bacteria used in chsese making. A review. Milchwisscoschaff 31:85. 10Chauda.11, R. C., P. J. Argyle, and G. E. Mithison. 1982. Action of Luctotmcillus bulgan'cus proteinase prepamtiom on milk proteins. J. Dairy Sci. 65:1408.
  3. 22Grappin, R., T. C. Rank, and N. F. Olson 1985. Primary prorotcolysis of cheese proteins during ripCning. A review. J. Dairy Sci. 68531.
  4. 39Mnrth, E. H. 1963. Microbiological and chemical aspects of Cheddar cheese ripening. A review. J. Dairy Sci. 46:869.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khalid, N. M., El Soda, M., & Marth, E. H.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
1991-01
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
29-45
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995962368
Cited by
37
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Institut Penyelidikan dan Kemajuan Pertanian Malaysia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Keywords
Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, aminopeptidase, dipeptidase, proteolytic activity, intracellular proteases, cell-free extracts, freeze-thaw inactivation, viable cell count, skim milk, growth phase, strain differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review