The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of Fat and Emulsifiers on the Efficacy of Nisin in Inhibiting Listeria monocytogenes in Fluid Milk
Open accessAbstract
The recent FDA affirmation of nisin, an antimicrobial peptide, as a GRAS (generally recognized as safe) additive in pasteurized cheese spreads has renewed interest in its potential application in US dairy products. Fluid milks were prepared with varying concentrations of milk fat (0 to 12.9%) and of nisin (0 to 50 U/ml). Biological activity assays using a sensitive indicator microorganism in a well diffusion system indicated that initial nisin activity (50 U/ml) decreased by about 33% when it was added to skim milk and by more than 88% when added to milk containing 12.9% fat. Nisin activity decreased by ca. 50% in milk containing 1.29% fat. Milks containing 0, 10, or 50 U/ml of nisin and varying fat percentages were challenged with approximately log10 7 to 7.5 cfu/ml of log phase Listeria monocytogenes Scott A or Jalisco. At 2 h after inoculation, the viable count of L. monocytogenes Scott A decreased to log10 .30 cfu/ml in skim milk with 50 U/ml of nisin, decreased to log10 2.90 cfu/ml in skim milk with 10 U/ml of nisin, and increased slightly (log10 7.8 cfu/ml) in skim milk without nisin. In half-and-half (12.9% milk fat), nisin was far less effective in inhibiting Listeria with populations decreasing to log10 6.57 cfu/ml for 10 U/ml of nisin and log10 5.87 cfu/ml for 50 U/ml. Similar results were obtained with L. monocytogenes Jalisco. The nonionic emulsifier, Tween 80, partially counteracted decreases of nisin activity in milks, whereas the anionic emulsifier, lecithin, had no effect. Addition of Tween 80 significantly increased the activity of nisin against L. monocytogenes in milk regardless of fat content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biopreservation by lactic acid bacteria
Stiles, M. E. (1996) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/bf00395940 · Cited by 733
Gharsallaoui, A., Oulahal, N., Joly, C., & Degraeve, P. (2016) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2013.763765 · Cited by 459
Application of bacteriocins in vegetable food biopreservation
Settanni, L., & Corsetti, A. (2008) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.09.001 · Cited by 441
Use of nisin and other bacteriocins for preservation of dairy products
Sobrino-López, A., & Martín-Belloso, O. (2008) · International Dairy Journal · doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2007.11.009 · Cited by 289
Novel Natural Food Antimicrobials
Juneja, V. K., Dwivedi, H. P., & Yan, X. (2012) · Annual Review of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1146/annurev-food-022811-101241 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, D.-S., Bodyfelt, F. W., & Daeschel, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 387-393
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068967252
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Fat and Emulsifiers on the Efficacy of Nisin in Inhibiting Listeria monocytogenes in Fluid Milk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(92)77773-x
- The paper
- Jung, D.-S., Bodyfelt, F. W., & Daeschel, M. A. (1992). Influence of Fat and Emulsifiers on the Efficacy of Nisin in Inhibiting Listeria monocytogenes in Fluid Milk. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(92)77773-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.