The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review: Effect of Protein Nutrition on Ovarian and Uterine Physiology in Dairy Cattle
Open accessAbstract
Milk production and dry matter intake of dairy cows are stimulated in response to increased intake of dietary protein, but, unfortunately, decreased fertility is often associated with this nutritional strategy. Ruminally degradable protein or ruminally undegradable protein in excess of requirement can contribute to reduced fertility in lactating cows. Dietary protein nutrition or utilization and the associated effects on ovarian or uterine physiology have been monitored with urea nitrogen in plasma or milk; concentrations above 19 mg/dl have been associated with altered uterine pH and reduced fertility in dairy cows. The uterine pH changed dynamically and inversely with plasma urea nitrogen, signaling possible changes in the uterine milieu. Mechanisms for reduced fertility include exacerbation of negative energy balance and reduced plasma progesterone concentrations when cows were fed rations that were high in ruminally degradable intake protein. Alternatively, changes in uterine secretions that are associated with high protein intake and elevated plasma urea nitrogen might be detrimental to embryos. Bovine endometrial cells in culture respond directly to increasing urea concentrations with alteration in pH gradient but respond most notably with increased secretion of prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2 alpha). Increased uterine luminal PGF2 alpha interferes with embryo development and survival in cows, thus providing a plausible link between elevated plasma urea nitrogen concentrations and decreased fertility. Poor fertility in high producing dairy cows reflects the combined effects of a uterine environment that is dependent on progesterone and rendered suboptimum by the antecedent effects of negative energy balance or postpartum health problems and that is further compromised by the effects of urea resulting from intake of high dietary protein.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nutritional interactions with reproductive performance in dairy cattle
Butler, W. R. (2000) · Animal Reproduction Science · doi:10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00076-2 · Cited by 759
Self-citationFertility in the high-producing dairy cow
Pryce, J. E., Royal, M. D., Garnsworthy, P. C., & Mao, I. L. (2004) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(03)00145-3 · Cited by 553
Castillo, A., Kebreab, E., Beever, D., & France, J. (2000) · Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences · doi:10.22358/jafs/68025/2000 · Cited by 374
Pasture feeding changes the bovine rumen and milk metabolome
O’Callaghan, T., Vázquez-Fresno, R., Serra-Cayuela, A., Dong, E., Mandal, R., Hennessy, D., McAuliffe, S., Dillon, P., Wishart, D., Stanton, C., et al. (2018) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo8020027 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Butler, W. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2533-2539
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095798808
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review: Effect of Protein Nutrition on Ovarian and Uterine Physiology in Dairy Cattle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)70146-8
- The paper
- Butler, W. R. (1998). Review: Effect of Protein Nutrition on Ovarian and Uterine Physiology in Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)70146-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.