Cited by 363Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

The importance of pH in the regulation of ruminal acetate to propionate ratio and methane production in vitro.

Open access
Russell, J.B.·1998·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Grain feeding often causes a decrease in ruminal pH, and experiments were conducted to define the role of pH in regulating the acetate to propionate ratio and production of CH4. Cows that were fed 90% concentrate had lower ruminal pH values (6.22 vs. 6.86), higher VFA concentrations (85 vs. 68 mM), and lower acetate to propionate ratios (2.24 vs. 4.12) than did cows that were fed forage only. When mixed ruminal bacteria from cows that were fed 90% concentrate or 100% forage were incubated (48 h) with hay (10 g/L) or cracked corn (5 g/L) in a medium containing bicarbonate (38 mM) and tricarballylate (50 mM), the final pH values were less than 0.3 units lower than the initial pH. At final pH values less than 5.7, hay fermentation was inhibited, the acetate to propionate ratio and CH4 production declined more than twofold, and the inoculum source was without effect. Small amounts of H2 were detected at pH values less than 5.5. Total VFA production from cracked corn decreased when pH declined, but only if the inoculum was obtained from cows that were fed 90% concentrate. The acetate to propionate ratio of cracked corn incubations declined from 1.2 to 0.6 when final pH was decreased from 6.5 to 5.3, and CH4, as a percentage of total VFA production, also decreased. At pH values less than 5.3, the acetate to propionate ratio of cracked corn increased more than fourfold, and large amounts of H2 could be detected. Over the final pH range of 6.5 to 5.3, CH4 production was highly correlated with acetate to propionate ratio, which was dependent on pH and substrate (CH4 = 0.02 + 0.05 pH; r2 = 0.80). Calculations based on the differences between pH 6.5 and 5.8 indicated that as much as 25% of the decrease in acetate to propionate ratio could be explained by the effect of pH alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75886-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methanogenesis is inhibited at low pH, as exemplified by no CH4 production at pH 5.5 or below in in-vitro cultures inoculated with rumen fluid from roughage-fed cows.

    “It is well documented that methanogenesis is inhibited at low pH, as exemplified by no CH4 production at pH 5.5 or below in in-vitro cultures inoculated with rumen fluid from roughage-fed cows (Russell, 1998).”

    From Comparative Analysis of the Microbiota Between Sheep Rumen and Rabbit Cecum Provides New Insight Into Their Differential Methane Production (2018) · cites this paper as Russell, 1998

    The Results and Discussion report that low pH reduced CH4 production in vitro, including incubations using bacteria from forage-fed cows. The paper reports a more-than-twofold decline in CH4 production below pH 5.7, but the text does not establish the claimed absence of CH4 production at pH 5.5 or below. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 363

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hungate, R. E. 1966. The rumen and its microbes. Acad. Press, New York, NY.
  2. National Research Council. 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 7th ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
  3. Wolin, M. J. 1975. Interactions between the bacterial species in the rumen. Pages 134-148 in Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant. I. W. MacDonald and A.C.I. Warner, ed. Univ. New England Pub. Unit, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.

Authors
Russell, J. B.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Russell, J.B.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
1998-12
Volume
81
Issue
12
Pages
3222-3230
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017662902
Cited by
363
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 21
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (1999-04-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
rumen pH, acetate to propionate ratio, methane production, volatile fatty acids, grain feeding, rumen bacteria, cracked corn, hydrogen production, dairy cattle, in vitro rumen fermentation, bicarbonate
MeSH terms
Acetates, Animals, Cattle, Zea mays, Diet, Female, Homeostasis, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Methane, Propionates, Rumen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review