The DOI matches its Crossref record.
METODOLOGIA CIENTÍFICA: ANÁLISE E REFLEXÃO SOBRE A PERCEPÇÃO DOS GRADUANDOS
Open accessAbstract
Academic training consists of improving the concept and knowledge that is interconnected through methods and tools that are capable of providing security and autonomy for undergraduates. In this sense, the main objective of the Scientific Methodology is to study the methods, forms or instruments necessary for the construction of a scientific research, and can provide critical thinking to the researcher. Thus, the present study was carried out in the Sertão Central Pernambucano, and had the objective of analyzing the impacts of Scientific Methodology in the training of undergraduate students, both in their social and professional life. Inductive methods were used through a qualitative research, in order to carry out a broad analysis, in the face of difficulties encountered by undergraduates in relation to scientific methods. The research was developed in two stages, one of them the field study. It was verified that, although they have difficulties, the students presented knowledge coming from the Teaching Medium or even empiric one on the subject approached. The level of knowledge of the academic productions was perceived during a gradual advance, from the entrance in the Higher Education. It is noticed that, the scientific methods are important in the academic formation, since the students argue to have improvement in the writing, having a wider vision with respect to textual productions and improvement of the knowledge, happening to produce works with greater consistency. Regarding the professional and personal context, the interviewees affirm that the curriculum is enriched from the Scientific Methodology, making them critical to certain situations. In view of the above, it is necessary to insert scientific methods since Basic Education, since Scientific Methodology is important in the academic, professional, personal and cultural life of the undergraduate students, transforming them and generating impacts in themselves and in society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“some authors used more than one design to characterize this variable [29,35,36].”
From Lean Healthcare Tools for Processes Evaluation: An Integrative Review. (2021) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- AMOROSA, F. C; AMOROSA, A. V. A pesquisa no ensino superior: um ensaio sobre metodologia. Científica .Estação Científica (UNIFAP) ISSN 2179-1902. Macapá, v. 6, n. 3, p. 127-136, set./dez. 2016. · DOI
- BRIGHENTI, J; BIAVATTI, V, T; SOUZA, T, R, de. Metodologia de Ensino-Aprendizagem: uma abordagem sobre a percepção do aluno. Revista GUAI, Florianópolis, V.8, N.3, P.281-304. 2015. · DOI
- FREITAS, C. M; SIQUEIRA L. F; CIBELLY A.; FEIJÃO P; JOSÉ R; OSAWA V; MARISTELA I; KÉLEN L, G; OLIVEIRA DE M, K; COELHO M, S; DÁVILA R. M, J. Uso de metodologias ativas de aprendizagem para a educação na saúde: análise da produção científica Trabalho, Educação e Saúde, vol. 13, núm. 2, diciembre, 2015, pp. 117-130 Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. · DOI
- SANTOS, V, C; ANJOS, K, F, dos; ALMEIDA, O, S. A percepção de formandos sobre a pesquisa em enfermagem no curso de graduação. Ver. Enferm. UFSM 2013 jan./abril; 3(1): 144 – 154. · DOI
Cited by
Lean Healthcare Tools for Processes Evaluation: An Integrative Review.
de Barros, L. B., Bassi, L. D. C., Caldas, L. P., Sarantopoulos, A., Zeferino, E. B. B., Minatogawa, V., & Gasparino, R. C. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18147389 · Cited by 90
“In addition, some authors used more than one design to characterize this variable [29,35,36].”
BackgroundResult
Metadata
- Authors
- RODRIGUES, F. W. A., & MEDEIROS, G. R. S. D.
- Venue
- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL EDUCATION AND TEACHING (PDVL) ISSN 2595-2498
- Published
- 2019-08-31
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-60
- ISSN
- 2595-2498 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2942758692
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL EDUCATION AND TEACHING (PDVL) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education in Brazil
- Social Sciences › Education › Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- research methodology, undergraduate students, student perceptions, undergraduate education, critical thinking, academic writing, research training, curriculum enrichment, early childhood science education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: METODOLOGIA CIENTÍFICA: ANÁLISE E REFLEXÃO SOBRE A PERCEPÇÃO DOS GRADUANDOS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.31692/2595-2498.v2i1.90
- The paper
- RODRIGUES, F. W. A., & MEDEIROS, G. R. S. D. (2019). METODOLOGIA CIENTÍFICA: ANÁLISE E REFLEXÃO SOBRE A PERCEPÇÃO DOS GRADUANDOS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL EDUCATION AND TEACHING (PDVL) ISSN 2595-2498. https://doi.org/10.31692/2595-2498.v2i1.90
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.