Cited by 21Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Insights into Student Perceptions: Investigating Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool Usability in Irish Higher Education at the University of Limerick

Open access
Irfan, Muhammad, Murray, Liam, Ali, Sajjad·2023·Global Digital & Print Media Review

Abstract

This research study scrutinizes the perception of Artificial Intelligence (AI) utilities, particularly focusing on the student cohort at the University of Limerick, Republic of Ireland. The research aims to compile an exhaustive assortment of both affirmative and critical perspectives to construct a holistic comprehension of the students' viewpoints. Utilizing a quantitative research design that entails the distribution of survey questionnaires to a sample size of 120 students spanning multiple departments and faculties, of which 93 students responded. The survey questionnaire consists of 9 questions meticulously structured to procure insights into the students' opinions with AI utilities like Chat GPT. The findings are highlighting the strengths and shortcomings of AI tools in education and critical thinking, suggesting potential areas of enhancement. It is illuminating the interplay of hope and fear among the students in relation to the use of AI tools in their educational journey and critical thinking with learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31703/gdpmr.2023(vi-ii).05

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Baker, R., Evans, B., & Dee, T. (2019). An experimental evaluation of the impacts of AI-driven tutoring systems on student outcomes. Journal of Learning Sciences, 28(4), 587-609.
  2. Brown, S., & Jones, M. (2023). Streamlining Administrative Functions in Higher Education Institutions with AI. Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 112-128.
  3. Dastani, M. (1998). Languages of perception. In Computational Models of Creative Cognition (pp. 305-322). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  4. Davis, R., & Johnson, M. (2020). Personalized Learning with AI: A Review of Educational Applications. Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 135-152
  5. Irfan, M. & Murray, L. (2023). Micro- Credential: A guide to prompt writing and engineering in higher education: A tool for Artificial Intelligence in LLM. University of Limerick. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.34961/researchrepository-ul.22868414.v1 · DOI
  6. Irfan, M. & Murray, L. (2023). Policy for Merging ArtificiaI Intelligence (AI) with Social Sciences in Central Asian's Higher Education Institutions. University of Limerick. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.34961/researchrepository-ul.22780049.v1 · DOI
  7. Irfan, M., & Khan, N. U. (2022). Influence of Mobile Phone Usage on the Academic Performance of Students: A Case Study of Malakand Division Students. International Journal of Computational Intelligence in Control, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.34961/researchrepository-ul.21424350.v1 · DOI
  8. Irfan, M., & MURRAY, L. (2023, May 10). Empowering Critical skills of Teaching and Learning with Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools. University of Limerick. https://doi.org/10.34961/researchrepository-ul.22788506.v1 · DOI
  9. Jones, A., & Brown, S. (2022). AI-Enabled Assessments in Education: Current Trends and Future Directions. Journal of Educational Assessment, 39(3), 201-218
  10. Kelly, L., et al. (2022). Predictive Analytics for Student Success: Leveraging AI in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 501-518.
  11. Khan, D.-Z., Azeem, M. & Irfan, M. (2021). Investigating the Relationship between Study Habits and Academic Achievements: Policy, Practices and Pedagogies in Learning and Assessment in Higher Education. Webology 18(6), 4025-4031.
  12. Kumar, R., Ochoa, C., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2020). Utilising artificial intelligence to advance the higher education sector: a systematic literature review. Higher Education Quarterly, 75(1), 45-64.
  13. Lee, H., & Park, S. (2023). Leveraging AI- Powered Data Analytics in Education: A Systematic Review. Journal of Learning Analytics, 51(1), 89-104.
  14. Lim, D. H., Reiser, R. A., & Olina, Z. (2021). The effects of part- and whole-task simulation approaches on acquisition and transfer of a complex cognitive skill. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 277-295.
  15. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education. Pearson Education.
  16. Nisa, M. U., Yousafzai, D. M., & Irfan, M. (2021). Media Literacy Concepts & Role Of Media Literacy Inflict's: A Literature Review. researchgate.net, 20(3), 2506-2518, available: http://dx.doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.03.286 · DOI
  17. O'Connor, P., & McAndrew, S. (2021). Enhancing Learning Experiences with AI-Powered Chatbots in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 167-185.
  18. Oluwatayo, J., & Oyebade, O. (2019). Digital health adoption: Looking beyond the role of technology. Journal of Medical Systems, 43(11), 310.
  19. Smith, J. (2022). Personalized Learning through AI in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 39(2), 79-94.
  20. Smith, J., et al. (2021). AI-Enhanced Content Creation in Education: A Systematic Review. Journal of Educational Technology, 59(3), 123-140.
  21. Walsh, E., et al. (2021). Reskilling and Workforce Development in the Era of AI in Higher Education. Journal of Lifelong Learning, 36(4), 567-582.
  22. Wang, Q., Huang, C., Quek, C.L., & Yang, H. (2020). Students' perceptions of artificial intelligence-enhanced teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 914-929
  23. Wilson, L., et al. (2021). AI-Powered Virtual Assistants in Education: Enhancing Student Engagement and Support. Journal of Educational Technology, 66(2), 78- 94.
  24. APA : Irfan, M., Murray, L., & Ali, S. (2023). Insights into Student Perceptions: Investigating Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool Usability in Irish Higher Education at the University of Limerick. Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI(II), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdpmr.2023(VI-II).05
  25. CHICAGO : Irfan, Muhammad, Liam Murray, and Sajjad Ali. 2023. "Insights into Student Perceptions: Investigating Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool Usability in Irish Higher Education at the University of Limerick." Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI (II): 48-63 doi: 10.31703/gdpmr.2023(VI-II).05
  26. HARVARD : IRFAN, M., MURRAY, L. & ALI, S. 2023. Insights into Student Perceptions: Investigating Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool Usability in Irish Higher Education at the University of Limerick. Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI, 48-63.
  27. MHRA : Irfan, Muhammad, Liam Murray, and Sajjad Ali. 2023. "Insights into Student Perceptions: Investigating Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool Usability in Irish Higher Education at the University of Limerick." Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI: 48-63
  28. MLA : Irfan, Muhammad, Liam Murray, and Sajjad Ali. "Insights into Student Perceptions: Investigating Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool Usability in Irish Higher Education at the University of Limerick." Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI.II (2023): 48-63 Print.
  29. OXFORD : Irfan, Muhammad, Murray, Liam, and Ali, Sajjad (2023), "Insights into Student Perceptions: Investigating Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool Usability in Irish Higher Education at the University of Limerick", Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI (II), 48-63
  30. TURABIAN : Irfan, Muhammad, Liam Murray, and Sajjad Ali. "Insights into Student Perceptions: Investigating Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool Usability in Irish Higher Education at the University of Limerick." Global Digital & Print Media Review VI, no. II (2023): 48-63. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdpmr.2023(VI-II).05

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Irfan, M., Murray, L., & Ali, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Limerick (IE)
  • University of Malakand (PK)
Venue
Global Digital & Print Media Review
Published
2023-06-30
Volume
VI
Issue
II
Pages
48-63
ISSN
  • 2788-4945 (ISSN-L)
  • 2788-4988
OpenAlex
W4388797748
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Digital & Print Media Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, student perceptions, ChatGPT, higher education, critical thinking, University of Limerick, student attitudes toward AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insights into Student Perceptions: Investigating Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool Usability in Irish Higher Education at the University of Limerick. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.31703/gdpmr.2023(vi-ii).05
The paper
Irfan, M., Murray, L., & Ali, S. (2023). Insights into Student Perceptions: Investigating Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool Usability in Irish Higher Education at the University of Limerick. Global Digital & Print Media Review. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdpmr.2023(vi-ii).05