Cited by 1Qur’anic Interpretation StudiesCriminal Law and PolicyLegal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia

Exploring Islamic Injunctions on Remission of Sentences

Open access
Tabassum, Sadia, Munir, Bakht, Wattoo, Omar Mahmood·2020·Global Legal Studies Review

Abstract

The most significant and all-encompassing purpose of punishments in Islamic law is to make the offender repent and mend his ways. For this purpose, Islamic law provides various provisions both at the preconviction as well as post-conviction stages. With qualitative research methodology and Islamic injunctions, this research aims to examine, at the pre-conviction stage, provisions about repentance and expiation on the part of the offender, suspension of punishment in case of voluntary surrender, probation after repentance and surrender and payment of compensation to the victims of the offence. At the post-arrest and conviction stage, Islamic law provides various relaxations and creates space for repentance and reform, which include obliteration of the punishments of apostasy and blasphemy, considering denial by the accused of the commission of the offence, obliteration of the hudud and qisas punishments, and obliteration of the siyasah punishments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31703/glsr.2020(v-iv).01

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effectiveness of the non-punitive approach is contingent upon the availability of trained counsellors, adequate facilities, and follow-up support.

    “However, the effectiveness of this approach is contingent upon the availability of trained counsellors, adequate facilities and follow-up support (Tabassum et al., 2020).”

    From APOSTASY PUNISHMENT IN ISLAMIC SCHOLARLY DISCOURSE: PERSPECTIVES AND IMPLICATIONS IN THE MALAYSIAN CONTEXT (2025) · cites this paper as Tabassum et al., 2020

    The Abstract and Introduction discuss remission, repentance, and opportunities for rehabilitation, but do not assess what makes a non-punitive approach effective. Searches for counsellors, facilities, and follow-up support found no passage making the claimed resource-dependent point. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tabassum, S., Munir, B., & Wattoo, O. M.
Affiliations
  • International Islamic University, Islamabad (PK)
  • University of the Punjab (PK)
Venue
Global Legal Studies Review
Published
2020-12-30
Volume
V
Issue
IV
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 2708-2458 (ISSN-L)
  • 2708-2466
OpenAlex
W3124389824
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Global Legal Studies Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
Keywords
remission of sentence, Islamic criminal law, repentance, expiation, hudud, qisas, siyasah, apostasy, blasphemy, voluntary surrender

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review