Critical Review on Test Match Format of Cricket
Open accessAbstract
This study is a qualitative review of the test match format of Cricket; therefore, different websites and online articles were reviewed critically. The study motivation is to find out the reason(s) for the less viewership and business for the test format. Therefore, this study provides the critical analysis of three different cricket formats: test format, one-day format, and t-twenty format. The scope of this study is; Cricket provides business, entertainment, and promotion to the stakeholders. The audience does not like the test format as compared to the t-twenty and one-day match format because the test format requires more time than the other two formats. Moreover, it will prove helpful for researchers, and beginners, who have a great interest in Cricket
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Bril, G. D. (1984). Algorithm AS 206: Isotonic regression in two independent variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 33(3), 352- 357.
- Durga, P. (2020). Setting final target score in T- 20 cricket match by the team batting first. Journal of Sports Analytics, 1-8.
- Krishna, S. (2017). CRICKET IN ABSTEMIOUS TIMES. India International Centre Quarterly, 44, 81-89.
- No ICC World T20 in 2018, next edition in 2020. (2017, June 18). TheHindu: https://www.thehindu.com/
- Rumford, C. (2011). Twenty20, global disembedding, and the rise of the 'portfolio player. Sport in Society, 14(10), 1358-1368.
- Umpire decision review system the merits demerits. (2014, July 02). = cricket country: https://www.cricketcountry.com/
- APA : Farooq, M. W., Farooq, M., & Rauf, A. (2021). Critical Review on Test Match Format of Cricket. Global Social Sciences Review, VI(II), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).13
- CHICAGO : Farooq, Muhammad Waqas, Mahwish Farooq, and Abdul Rauf. 2021. "Critical Review on Test Match Format of Cricket." Global Social Sciences Review, VI (II): 121-129 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).13
- HARVARD : FAROOQ, M. W., FAROOQ, M. & RAUF, A. 2021. Critical Review on Test Match Format of Cricket. Global Social Sciences Review, VI, 121-129.
- MHRA : Farooq, Muhammad Waqas, Mahwish Farooq, and Abdul Rauf. 2021. "Critical Review on Test Match Format of Cricket." Global Social Sciences Review, VI: 121-129
- MLA : Farooq, Muhammad Waqas, Mahwish Farooq, and Abdul Rauf. "Critical Review on Test Match Format of Cricket." Global Social Sciences Review, VI.II (2021): 121-129 Print.
- OXFORD : Farooq, Muhammad Waqas, Farooq, Mahwish, and Rauf, Abdul (2021), "Critical Review on Test Match Format of Cricket", Global Social Sciences Review, VI (II), 121-129
- TURABIAN : Farooq, Muhammad Waqas, Mahwish Farooq, and Abdul Rauf. "Critical Review on Test Match Format of Cricket." Global Social Sciences Review VI, no. II (2021): 121-129. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Position-specific fielding instances and utilisation in professional men’s T20 cricket
Lee, T. A., Novak, A. R., & Pickering Rodriguez, E. C. (2026) · International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport · doi:10.1080/24748668.2025.2492980 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Comparatively, multi-day cricket provides both teams with an opportunity for two batting innings, with the match constrained by both a time limit (usually 4 or 5 days) and an over limit (Farooq et al., 2021).”
- Authors
- Farooq, M. W., Farooq, M., & Rauf, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Central Punjab (PK)
- Assistant Manager Operations, Lahore Waste Management Company, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
- Venue
- Global Social Sciences Review
- Publisher
- Humanity Only - HO
- Published
- 2021-06-30
- Volume
- VI
- Issue
- II
- Pages
- 121-129
- ISSN
- 2520-0348 (ISSN-L)
- 2616-793X
- OpenAlex
- W3179472150
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Social Sciences Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Physical Education and Sports Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
- Keywords
- crickets, sports entertainment, match duration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
